Laserfiche WebLink
<br />by snow melt, rather than the HEC-l results obtained by modeling <br />rainfall-runoff characteristics. The u.s. Army Corps of Engineers <br />(USACE) HEC-1 model was used to develop peak discharges for <br />II~inois and Jones Gulches. <br /> <br />Peak discharge-drainage area relationships for Blue River Middle <br />Branch and Cucumber, Illinois, and Jones Gulches are shown in <br />Table 1, "Summar.y of Dischar.ges." <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses for Blue River Middle Branch and Cucumber, <br />Illinois, and Jones Gulches were computed using the USACE HEC-2 <br />computer program (Reference 7). starting water-surface elevation~ <br />were determined by the slope-area method or predetermined ~ <br />elevations. <br /> <br />cross-section and geometric data, such as culvert sizes, inverts, <br />bridge dimensions, and roadway elevations, were obtained from a <br />variety of sources. Information from the original Flood Insurance <br />Study for the Town of Breckenridge (Reference 12) served as a <br />base. Additionally, cross sections were surveyed specifically for <br />this restudy, particularly in areas where the topography was known <br />to have changed. Restudies of the flood plain had been conducted <br />for recent developments in the Town of Breckenridge. Several <br />short sections of river had been surveyed for. projects such as <br />pipeline crossings or new bridge construction. This information <br />was also incorporated into the restudy. Finally, the 1980 <br />Breckenridge Town Topographic Mapping was used in areas where it <br />was known that conditions changed between the time of the original <br />study and production of the Breckenridge Town Topographic Mapping. <br /> <br />To determine channel and over.bank roughness coefficients <br />(Manning's "n" values), an assessment of the conditions along each <br />channel was made. In areas where channel alterations had not been <br />made, the general, main channel "n" values ranged between 0.0035 <br />and O.DOSO. Overbank "n" values ranged from 0.0350 to 0.1000. <br /> <br />As part of this revision, the format of the map panels has <br />changed. Previously, flood-hazard information was shown on both <br />the Flood Insurance Rate Map and Flood Boundary and Floodway Map. <br />In the new format, all base flood elevations, cross sections, zone <br />designations, and flood plain and tloodway boundary delineations <br />are shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map and the Flood Boundary <br />and Floodway Map has been eliminated. Some of the flood insurance <br />zone designations were changed to reflect the new format. Areas <br />previously shown as numbered Zone A were changed to Zone AE. <br />Areas previously shown as Zone B were changed to Zone X (shaded) <br />Areas previously shown as Zone C were changed to Zone X <br />(unshaded). In addition, all Flood Insurance Zone Data Tables <br />were removed from the Flood Insurance Study report and all zone <br />designations and reach determinations were removed from the <br />profile panels. <br /> <br />The Flood Insurance Study for the unincorporated areas of Summit <br />county, Colorado (Reference 13), is being updated concurrently <br />with this restudy. These studies are in agreement with each <br />other. <br /> <br />Table 2, "Floodway Data," and Exhibit 1, "Flood Profiles," were <br />revised to reflect changes as a result of the restudy. <br /> <br />20 <br />