Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />I I I I I r <br />_______I_______~-------~-------I-------~-------~------- <br />I 1 I I I I <br />_ _ _ __ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ --'- _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _1_ _"_ _ _ _ _ ,]. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1_ _ . <br />: : :-Cottonwoo~ Curve: : - - - - -- <br />_______1_______4_______~_____ -I-------~---- ~ <br />I I I I <br />I I I I I I <br />-------I-------,-------r-------I---- ----r------- <br />I I I I I I <br /> <br />- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ - - - - - -i- - - - - - - ~ -7- - ~ - - - - ~.. <br /> <br />--______1 _____.__--'- ____ __ ___1_______1___ ___I <br />- : - I - :- - - Col9rado Spring~ Polynomial ~urve - - - - <br />________1_____ -4- _____~--_----1-------4-_-----~-_----- <br />I I I I I <br />I I I I I I <br />-------1-- -,-------r-------I-------,-------r-------- <br />I I I I I I <br /> <br /> <br />Due to the expense involved in generating these engineering reports and the legal fees <br />involved in going to Water Court, many cities which filed for a water credit accepted, and continue to <br />accept, the 15% water credit. The money they would have spent hiring engineering consultants and in <br />litigation was used to acquire additional water rights. <br /> <br />~ 100 <br />- <br />-g 90 <br />:a 80 <br />Co <br /><( 70 <br />.. <br />~ 60 <br />3: 50 <br />- <br />g 40 <br />:0::; <br />-5 30 <br />~ 20 <br />Q) <br />Q. 10 <br />Co <br />$ 0 <br />c <br />o <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />100 150 200 250 <br />Water Applied I Potential CU ("!o) <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br />350 <br /> <br />Cottonwood Curve: <br /> <br />Colorado Springs Polynomial Curve: <br /> <br />55 <WA/ClI <160 DP!WA=0.357*WA/ClI-19.6 <br />W A/ClI >160 DP!W A=IOO*(W A/ClI-IOO)/(App/ClI) <br /> <br />DP!W A= -0.6993+ 1.6633(W A/ClI)-0.8847* <br />(W A/ClI)^2+0.2147(W A/ClI)^ 3- <br />0.0197(W A/ClI)^4 <br /> <br />Fig.\. Deep Percolation as a Function of Applied Water -- Cottonwood and Gronning Curves <br /> <br />The City of Colorado Springs Study -- the Gronning Line <br /> <br />The city of Colorado Springs (approximate 1994 population: 309,000, average annual water <br />use: 69,200 acre-ft; Saletta and Kaufman, 1994) believed that its return flows were substantially <br />greater than 15% of the water application. In 1985, Colorado Springs retained consulting engineers, <br />Gronning Engineering Company, and began its own lysimeter project. By 1986, Colorado Springs <br />had installed eighty-six, 40 cm diameter, drainage type lysimeters throughout the city. Today the city <br />still operates and maintains more than 90 lysimeters. Unlike the hand-packed soil profile lysimeters <br />used in the Cottonwood study, the Colorado Springs lysimeters used an undisturbed soil core profile <br />obtained from in situ Iysimeter placement. The lysimeter results were presented in a different format <br />than the Cottonwood Curve, and a straight line relationship, the "Gronning Line," was developed <br />demonstrating the relationship between effective irrigation application and gross irrigation return <br />flows. <br /> <br />3 <br />