Laserfiche WebLink
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br /> <br />Specific Water Problem <br /> <br />The western United States is experiencing rapid population growth which has placed <br />increased demands on the limited natural resources of the region, most notably, water. It has become <br />crucial for both agricultural and urban water users to protect their water rights and resources by <br />careful accounting and planning processes. Many Colorado Front Range cities obtain a significant <br />portion of their water supplies from transmountian sources, and as provided by Colorado water law, <br />transmountain water can be "used to extinction." Colorado Springs, for example, acquires about 75% <br />of its water supply from transmountain sources (Saletta and Kaufman, 1994). Municipalities with <br />large transmountain water sources and other "use to extinction" water rights have examined <br />landscape irrigation as a possible area to augment their water supplies. They believed that a <br />percentage of the lawn irrigation water was not used by the turf grass, deep percolated through the <br />turf grass root zone, and eventually became return flow to the stream and ground water systems. In <br />accordance with their water rights, this deep percolation water can be reused by the municipalities <br />(Wheeler, 1987; Gronning, 1989). <br /> <br />To quantify return flows several cities have used smalllysimeters to estimate turf grass <br />consumptive use and return flows. The accuracy of smalllysimeters is not well known and the <br />practice has been questioned by some who believe that smalllysimeters predict inaccurate <br />consumptive use and return flows. In response to these concerns, this research was sponsored by the <br />Office of the State Engineer of Colorado, the City of Colorado Springs, and the Colorado Water <br />Resources Research Institute. <br /> <br />Research Objectives <br /> <br />The overall goal of the research project was to evaluate methodologies used by various <br />municipalities in Colorado for estimating deep percolation from urban lawn water use. The <br />methodologies have used smalllysimeters whose accuracy in estimating consumptive use and deep <br />percolation was not well established. The other major objective was to cbeck the validity of <br />irrigation-return flow relationships developed by municipalities for claiming return flow credits. In <br />this context, the specific research concerns were as follows. <br /> <br />. Accuracy of smalllysimeters in estimating turf grass consumptive use, <br />. Amount of deep percolation as influenced by the amount of water applied, <br />. Amount of deep percolation as influenced by other factors such as the frequency of water <br />applications and the soil type. <br /> <br />The research findings reported in this paper are based on the analysis oHour-years data <br />(1992-1995). The CSU results of deep percolation using smalllysimeters are compared to two <br />previous studies conducted for the Cottonwood Water and Sanitation District in Denver (Wheeler, <br />1987) and for the City of Colorado Springs (Gronning, 1989). Accuracy of smalllysimeters in <br />estimating consumptive use is evaluated by comparing evapotranspiration results obtained from the <br />smalllysimeters to those obtained from a standard large Iysimeter and from the 1963 Penman <br />Equation (Jensen et aI., 1990). <br />