My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08022
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD08022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:13:26 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:22:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
272
County
Larimer
Community
Unincorporated Larimer County
Basin
South Platte
Title
FIS - Larimer County, Colorado, Unincorporated Areas, Volume I
Date
3/1/1987
Designation Date
3/1/1987
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4.2 Floodways <br /> <br />Encroachment on flood plains, such as structures and fill, reduces <br />flood-carrying capacity, increases flood heights and velocities, <br />and increases flood hazards in 'areas beyond the encroachment itself. <br />One aspect of flood plain management involves balancing the economic <br />gain from flood plain developm~nt against the resulting increase <br />in flood hazard. For purposes Jof the NFIP, a floodway is used as <br />a tool to assist local 'communi~ies in this aspect of flood plain <br />management. Under this concept, the area of the 100-year flood <br />plain is divided into a floodway and a floodway fringe. The floodway <br />is the channel of a stream, plus any adjacent flood plain areas, <br />that must be kept free of encrqachment so that the 100-year flood <br />can be carried without substan~ial increaseS in flood heights. <br />Minimum Federal standards limit such increases to 1.0 foot, provided <br />that hazardous velocities are not produced. The floodways in this <br />study are presented to local agencies as minimum standards that <br />can be adopted directly or tha~ Can be used as a basis for addi- <br />tional floodway studies. <br /> <br />The floodways for this study were divided into two categories based <br />upon the location of the stream. The mountain area criteria were <br />based upon the channel of the stream plus all flood plain areas <br />where the depth of flooding waS 18 inches or greater and the floodway <br />fringe area was the area where!flooding depths were 18 inches or <br />less and velocities were 3 fee~ per second or less (Figure 7). <br />The plains area criteria were ~ased upon the criteria of equal- <br />conveyance reduction from each ,side of the flood plain with aO.s- <br />foot limitation on flood height, provided that hazardous velocities <br />are not produced (Figure 8). ' <br /> <br />The floodways for the Big Thompson River upstream of Lake Estes <br />and Black Canyon Creek were ba$ed upon the criteria of equal convey- <br />ance reduction from each side df the flood plain with a 1.0-foot <br />limitation of increased flood ~eight, provided that hazardous velo- <br />cities are not produced (Fig~r~ 8). The floodway for the Fall <br />River was based upon the crite~ia of equal conveyance reduction <br />from each side of the flood pl~in with a 1.0-foot limitation on <br />increased energy grade line. <br /> <br />It WaS decided for portions of:the Dry Creek floodway to permit <br />encroachment to a point where ~he maximum rise in the 100-year <br />water-surface elevation would be no greater than 1.0 foot as computed <br />in the Dry Creek report (Refer~ncel). <br /> <br />The results of these computatidns are tabulated at selected cross <br />sections for each stream segment for which a floodway is computed <br />(Table 2). <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.