Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DEC-03-1993 13:47 <br />r~vn ~L1MWIC ~~W~~& <br />, . <br /> <br />FROM ~EPA REG ION 8 OEA <br />L,llU . <br /> <br />TO 9-86j&;174 <br />1:..a3.1!'.1~:S7 <br /> <br />P,003/006 <br /> <br />climatic changes could malee tllings a whole lot WOrsl,' salel Oleick. <br /> <br />, Under the present management I)'stem, even modest decre~es In runoff would lead <br />to draStic decIJne. In the leveLt of the major reservoirs, big drops In the generation o! <br />hydroelectricity, and cutbacks In water deliveries to somo us~rs. Even tOurism and <br />recreation could bo affected: tho temperature Increases expected to occur with the <br />greenhouse effect would have major adverso effectS on tho recreational ski lndustry in tht <br />Rocky Mount4!ru because of a substantial shortening of the skI season, a clccllne lit <br />snowpack, and a higher ratio of rain to snow. These same tempera.ture increases coul~ <br />increase the risk of sprlns flooding, And rese,..,.olt levels could experience much larget <br />fluctuations than at present, ' I <br />, , <br /> <br />The ,reates! problem lZ1 the basin Is 'With water quality, specIfically the &alt content! <br />(or salinity) of the water, Even without climatic changes, sallnlty standards are violated: <br />regularly, and even slight decreases in runoff would lead to much worse water quallty. Eveni <br />if climatic changes were to .increase overall IT.Inoff, salinity standarels wlll be violated I <br />regularly. ", ' '1 <br />, I <br />711e 5tudy authors recommend that water managers begin to think about ways ofl <br />reducing the risks of cihnatlc changes in the re~lon, jncrea~ini the flexibility ot water. 'I' <br />delivery sy'tems and laws, and incorporatIng the Issue of the greenhouse effect into lonl- <br />range plannins, <br /> <br />In Summltr)' , , <br />The hydrologic modeling results presented here suggest that large changes in [ <br />streamflow may occur In the CplOflldo Rivet BasIn as a result of climatic changes. Using I <br />sensitivity studies and projections from several general c:frcuhlllon models, this new study I <br />suggests that runoff In the basin Is more likely to decrease than Inmlase. Results or the 1\ <br />study sllgge~t that the impacts of tbese potential changes In streamnow would be felt <br />throughout the basin 115 changes in water deliverIes. reservoIr storage, and hydroele~lricit)' \ <br />prnduCllon. <br />, , <br />'We've spent billions of dollars building dams and Institutions \0 control the natural I <br />flows of the Colorado River to protect ourselves from natural droughts and floods. Now, i <br />virtually every drop of river water is spoken for. As a result. any permanent reduction in ! <br />average flow! is bound to adversely affect lonle or allllsers, and (lllr beslln(ormation says ; <br />that some permanent reductions Ill'e likely," said Glcick. I <br />I. <br /> <br />This new stlldy suggests Ihat mese effects will be sIgnificant, CopinS with such I <br />clltl'tate.lndu~ed changes, in the hydrologic regime wJl1 thereforo reqlllre flexlbllity, i <br />innovation, and a degree of political consensus that may not exlst In today's system of water I <br />~anagement in the Southwest, I <br />I <br />"The Colorado Basin has seen natural drou~hl5 in the plUt as severe as some of the <br />changes studied here, The dIfference is that climatic changes caused by the greenhouse <br />effect would be permanent," said Peter Oleic:k. <br /> <br />(ATTACHED TO THIS RELEASE /S "BACKGROUND TO THE STUDr AND A <br />SUMMARY OF THE REPORT'S ''MAJOR FiNDINGS. ") , <br /> <br />\ <br />If,r " <br />ltb\. f/ <br />I' ,il \ <br />0.1;\' .~ <br />_I' 1i;.J <br />ly t" v <br />~{I Jlt:. <br />'~j; <br />