My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07908
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:13:08 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:17:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
260
County
Jefferson
Community
Unincorporated Jefferson County
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - Sanderson Gulch/Weir Gulch Volume I
Date
8/1/1972
Designation Date
12/1/1987
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SECTION V <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />StabS Engineer - The relationShip of the Colorado <br />State Engineer to the problem of urban storm drain- <br />age detention reservoirs shall be investigated, <br /> <br />LEGAL <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />(1) The jurisdiction of the State Engineer over <br />storage reservoirs in relationship to height, <br />area, and damage potential shall be reported. <br />(2) Methods in whiCh the State Engineer's powers <br />may be applied to the problem of detention <br />reservoirs shall be investigated. <br /> <br />Section A-S of the engineering agreement for the SandersonjWeir <br />Gulch project requires that alternatives be reviewed by an attor- <br />ney who is an expert in Colorado drainage law. The original cOn- <br />cept was for the attorney to provide a specific legal opinion on <br />each alternative developed by the engineer. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Method of Utilizin1 Private Storage - In the event <br />that the Flood Flaln Ordinance proves insufficient to <br />obtain the necessary regulation over private storage <br />facilities, methods of utilizing these facilities shall <br />be stated. <br /> <br />With this charge in mind, the firm of Raphael Moses, noted attor- <br />ney in the field of water rights, was retained by Frasier & Gin- <br />gery, Inc. to provide the necessary legal opinions since it was <br />evident that conflicts with existing irrigation ditches and <br />reservoirs was an important part of the project. Mr. Dave Harri- <br />son, associate of Mr. Moses, accompanied the engineering staff of <br />Frasier & Gingery, Inc. On field investigations of the channels. <br />These field investigations, together with preliminary studies of <br />alternatives to be considered, beg~~ to point to the fact that a <br />key aspect to any approach to planning on Sanderson or Weir Gulches <br />would be the relationship of existing irrigation ditches and stor- <br />age reservoirs to drainage planning within the basin. For this <br />reason, a revised scope of work was prepared by Frasier & Gingery, <br />Inc. for Mr. Moses and furnished to Mr. Joe Shoemaker, attorney for <br />the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. The following para- <br />ryraphs reproduce that scope of work. <br /> <br />(I) Possible easement or contractual agreements <br />might be utilized. <br />(2) An option to purchase the land if its intended <br />use as a storage reservoir is ever abandoned. <br /> <br />(3) Liabilities which the owner of a private storage <br />facility assumes should be investigated. <br />Public Ownership of Reservoirs - Adv~ntages of public <br />ownership of reservoirs should be covered. <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />1. STORM WATER DETENTION RESERVOIRS <br /> <br />2. IRRIGATION DITCHES <br /> <br />Numerous reservoirs exist on both Sanderson and Weir Gulches which <br />provid~ a flood mitigating effect. Th~se reservoirs includp major <br />irrigation company storage reservoirs, recreational pools in park <br />developments, private pools within small corporations for aesthetic <br />value, and detention behind roadway fills. As the continuing exis- <br />tence of these reservoirs is in the public interest, certain methods <br />of assuring their perpetuality should be explored. <br />A. Flood Plain Ordinance - A review of the existing Urban <br />Drainage and Flood Control District Flood Plain Ordin- <br />ance should be undertaken. <br /> <br />It is understood and accepted that irrigation ditches were origin- <br />~lly ir.stalled under rural conditions where thp ditches were gen- <br />erally glad to accept any surface runoff since it represented a <br />valuable water rosource to them. Since they exist in an urban <br />environment today, it is questionable whether they have the right <br />to, or the obligation of, accepting water which has historically <br />flowed into the ditches. An investigation of Colorado State Law <br />as it applies to the points listed below shall be Undertaken. <br /> <br />(1) The applicability of the existing Flood Plaih <br />Ordinance to assure future use of detention <br />ponds should be evaluated. <br />(2) Areas of weakness under the existing Flood Plain <br />Ordinance should be pointed out suggesting that <br />additional regulation is necessary to apply to <br />storage reservoirs. <br /> <br />A. Ma'or Draina ewa Crossin s - At various locations, <br />~rr~gat~on ~tc es cross maJor drainageways. Where <br />such crossings cxi~t ~~d ~urfacc watcrs ~~y flow inte <br />the irrigation ditch, a significant damage liability <br />may exist to the ditch company if breaching of the dike <br />occurs at some location other than the natural drainage <br />path. It often occurs to me that any facilities installed <br />to alleviate this damage potential should be at the ex- <br />pense of the irrigation ditch company rather than the public <br />since the ditch was constructed across the natural drain- <br />ageway. <br /> <br />-64- <br /> <br />-6~- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.