My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07843
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07843
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:12:56 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:14:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Nationwide Summary of US Geological Survey Regional Regression Equations for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods or Ungaged Ssites 1993
Date
1/1/1993
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />SUMMARY OF STATE FLOOD-FREQUENCY <br />TECHNIQUES <br /> <br />By H.C. Riggs and W.O. Thomas, Jr. <br /> <br />The remainder of this report provides a summary <br />of the applicable rural and urban flood-frequency <br />reports on which the equations in National Flood <br />Frequency (NFF) Program are based. For each State <br />and metropolitan area, there is a summary of the data <br />used in developing the regression equations and a ref- <br />erence to the applicable report. A description of the <br />explanatory variables and a range of standard errors are <br />provided for the regression equations for each State or <br />metropolitan area. All figures and maps that could be <br />easily digitized are also included in this report. In some <br />cases, the user will need to consult the original report to <br />obtain some of the input variables for the regression <br />equations. <br />A few notes about designation of watershed <br />characteristics are appropriate. In the State summaries <br />that follow, different analysts used different symbols <br />for the same variable, We have not tried to standardize <br />notation here but have retained the notation used in the <br />original reports. The most prominent example of this <br />use of different notation (and terminology) is that for <br />main-channel slope, also referred to as channel slope, <br />or streambed slope, which is identified by a variety of <br />symbols such as S, SL, Sc, Sb, and Sm, Unless other- <br />wise noted, all these slopes are the slope between two <br />points on the main channel, 85- and 10-percent of the <br />channel length upstream from the gage or outlet of the <br />watershed. <br /> <br />Percentages, such as the percentage of the water- <br />shed in forests or lakes and ponds, are generally deter- <br />mined by a grid-sampling method using 20-80 points in <br />the watershed. A transparent grid is overlain the outline <br />of the watershed on the most appropriate topographic <br />map. The grid should have from 20-80 nodes within the <br />respective watershed boundary, the number of nodes <br />overlying green (forest) or blue (lakes and ponds) is <br />determined, and the percentage of forest or lakes and <br />ponds is computed as the number of node intersections <br />(with green or blue) divided by the total nodes within <br />the watershed. Mean basin elevation is also generally <br />determined by the same grid-sampling method averag- <br />ing elevations for 20-80 points in the watershed. Sev- <br /> <br />eral maps of variables such as mean annual <br />precipitation, the 2-year 24-hour rainfalI, average <br />annual snowfall and minimum mean January tempera- <br />ture are needed and provided for some States. The <br />maps provided in this report are, in most cases, of <br />smalIer scale than the maps provided in the statewide <br />flood-frequency report. In some instances, the user may <br />want to refer to the more detailed maps provided in the <br />statewide reports for a more accurate determination of <br />the explanatory variables, <br /> <br />The regression equations are provided in the <br />same fonnat as in the original reports. In the applica- <br />tion of these equations, it is often necessary to add a <br />constant to an independent variable that might equal <br />zero. These constants are not always shown in the <br />equations. The user should enter the actual value of the <br />variable and the necessary constants will be applied in <br />the computer program. <br /> <br />Precipitation frequencies, such as the 2-year 24- <br />hour precipitation or rainfall, are used as explanatory <br />variables in many of the statewide regression equa- <br />tions. In some of the statewide reports, this variable is <br />defined as the 24-hour 2-year precipitation or rainfall <br />rather than the 2-year 24-hour value. For standardiza- <br />tion in this report, we use the terminology 2-year 24- <br />hour precipitation even if the original statewide report <br />reversed the order of the adjectives. <br /> <br />A brief description of each variable used in the <br />regression equations is provided in the individual state- <br />wide summaries, It is assumed that the user is knowl- <br />edgeable with regard to determination of many of the <br />routine watershed characteristics, such as drainage area <br />and channel length, from topographic maps. The appli- <br />cable range of all variables is given in the NFF program <br />so the user will know if estimates are being made out- <br />side the range of data used in developing the regression <br />equations. The user is cautioned NOT to extrapolate <br />the flood estimates beyond the data used to develop the <br />equations. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF STATE FLOOD-FREQUENCY TECHNIQUES 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.