|
<br />
<br />References
<br />
<br />Benson, M,A" 1962a, Evolution of methods for evaluating
<br />the occurrence of floods: V.S. Geological Survey
<br />Water-Supply Paper 1580-A, 30 p,
<br />1962b, Factors influencing the occurrence of floods
<br />----;;; a humid region of diverse terrain: U.S, Geological
<br />Survey Water-Supply Paper 1580-B, 62 p.
<br />1964, Factors affecting the occurrence of floods in
<br />- ,
<br />the Southwest: V.S, GeologIcal Survey Water-Supply
<br />Paper 1580-D, 72 p.
<br />Bridges, W.C., 1982, Techniques for estimating magnitude
<br />and frequency of floods in Florida: U.S. Geological
<br />Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 82-
<br />4012,45 p.
<br />Crippen, J.R., 1982, Envelope curves for extreme flood
<br />events: American Society of Civil Engineers, v, 108,
<br />no. HYIO, p,I,208-1,212,
<br />Crippen, JR, and Bue, C.D., 1977, Maximum floodflows in
<br />the conterminous Vnited States: V,S. Geological
<br />Survey Water-Supply Paper 1887, 52 p,
<br />Cudworth, A.G., Jr" 1989, Flood Hydrology Manual: A
<br />Water Resources Technical Publication, U.S. Depart-
<br />ment of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver,
<br />Colorado.
<br />Dalrymple, T., 1949, Regional flood frequency: Presenta-
<br />tion at the 29th Annual Meeting of the Highway
<br />Research Board, Washington, D.e., December 13,
<br />1949,22 p.
<br />_1960, Flood-frequency analyses: U,S, Geological
<br />Survey Water-Supply Paper 1543-A, 80 p,
<br />Hansen, EM., Miller, J.R" and Schreiner, L.e., 1982, Appli-
<br />cation of probable maximum precipitation estimates--
<br />United States East of the 105th Meridian: Hydro-
<br />meteorological Report no, 52, National Weather Ser-
<br />vice, V,S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring,
<br />Maryland, 166 p,
<br />Inman, E,J" 1987, Simulation of flood hydrographs for
<br />Georgia streams: V,S. Geological Survey Water-
<br />Supply Paper 2317,
<br />Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, 1982,
<br />Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency:
<br />Bulletin 17B oflbe Hydrology Subcommittee, Office of
<br />Water Data Coordination, U.S. Geological Survey,
<br />Reston, Virginia.
<br />_1986, Feasibility of assigning a probability to the
<br />probable maximum flood: Report of the Hydrology
<br />Subcommittee, Office of Water Data Coordination,
<br />U,S. Geological Survey, 79 p.
<br />Jennings, M,E. and Cookmeyer, E.N., 1989, Plans for
<br />national flood frequency by microcomputer: Proceed-
<br />ings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 1989
<br />National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering,
<br />
<br />August 14-18, 1989, New Orleans, Louisiana, p. 386-
<br />391.
<br />Kirby, W.H., 1972, Computer-oriented Wilson-Hilferty
<br />transformation that preserves the first three moments
<br />and the lower bound of the Pearson Type 3 distribution:
<br />Water Resources Research, v, 8, no. 5, p. 1,251-1,254.
<br />_1981, Annual flood frequency analysis using V,S.
<br />Water Resources Council guidelines (program J407):
<br />V,S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 79-1336-1,
<br />WATSTORE Vser's Guide, v. 4, Chapter I, Section C,
<br />56 p. (Report was updated in 1981.)
<br />Miller, J.F., Frederick, R.H., and Tracey, R" 1973, Precipita-
<br />tion-frequency atlas of the western Vnited States (II
<br />vols.): V.S, Department of Commerce, National
<br />Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Atlas 2.
<br />Newton, D.W., and Herrin, J.C., 1982, Assessment of com-
<br />monly used methods of estimating flood frequency:
<br />Transportation Research Board 896, National Research
<br />Council, Washington, D,C., p. 10-30,
<br />Sauer, V.B., Thomas, W.O., Jr" Stricker, VA, and Wilson,
<br />K.V., 1983, Flood characteristics of urban watersheds
<br />in the United States: V.S. Geological Survey Water-
<br />Supply Paper 2207, 63 p,
<br />Sauer, V.B., 1985, New studies of urban flood frequency in
<br />the southeastern Vnited States: in International Sympo-
<br />sium Proceedings on Vrban Hydrology, Hydraulic
<br />Infrastructures and Water Quality Contrul, July 22-25,
<br />1985, University of Kentucky.
<br />_1989, Dimensionless hydrograph method of simulat-
<br />ing flood hydrographs: in Transportation Research
<br />Record 1224, Transportation Research Board, National
<br />Research Council, Washington, D.C., p. _
<br />Sherman, L.K" 1932, The relation of hydrographs of runoff
<br />to size and character of drainage basins: Transactions
<br />of the American Geophysical Vnion, p. 332-339.
<br />Stedinger, J.R., and Tasker, G.D., 1985, Regional hydrologic
<br />analysis..ordinary, weighted, and generalized least
<br />squares compared: Water Resources Research, v, 21,
<br />no. 9, p, 1,421-1,432.
<br />_1986, Regional hydrologic analysis 2, model-error
<br />estimators, estimation of sigma and log-Pearson type 3
<br />distributions: Water Resources Research, v. 22, no. 10,
<br />p. 1,487-],499.
<br />Stricker, V.A., and Sauer, V.B., 1982, Techniques for esti-
<br />mating flood hydro graphs for ungaged urban water-
<br />sheds: V.S,Geological Survey Open-File Report 82-
<br />365.
<br />Tasker, G.D., ]980, Hydrologic regression with weighted
<br />least squares: Water Resources Research, v. 16, no. 6,
<br />p.I,107-I,113.
<br />Tasker, G.D., and Stedinger, J.R., ]986, Regional skew with
<br />weighted LS regression: American Society of Civil
<br />Engineers Journa] of Water Resources Planning and
<br />Management, v. 112, no. 2, p. 225-237.
<br />
<br />APPUCABl.ITY AND UMITATIONS 21
<br />
|