Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FLOOD HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATION <br /> <br />By V.B. Sauer <br /> <br />The NFl' Program contains a procedure for com- <br />puting a typical hydrograph that represents average <br />runoff for a specified peak discharge, It is emphasized <br />that this is an average hydro graph, and is not necessar- <br />ily representative of any particular rainfaIl distribution. <br />The average, or typical, hydrograph could be consid- <br />ered a design hydrograph for some applications, <br />The procedure used in NFF to compute the aver. <br />age hydrograph is known as the dimensionless hydro- <br />graph method. Stricker and Sauer (1982) developed the <br />method for urban basins using theoretical techniques. <br />Later, Inman (1987) used actual streamflow data for <br />both urban and rural streams in Georgia, and confirmed <br />the theoretical dimensionless hydrograph developed by <br />Stricker and Sauer, Other investigators have since <br />developed similar dimensionless hydrographs for <br />numerous other States (Sauer, 1989). Except in some <br />relatively flat-topography, slow-runoff areas, the same <br />dimensionless hydro graph seems to apply with reason- <br />able accuracy. The dimensionless hydrograph <br />approach, however, is not applicable to snowmelt run- <br />off or for estimating more complex double-peaked <br />hydrographs. <br />The dimensionless hydrograph method has three <br />essential parts: (I) the peak discharge for which a <br />hydrograph is desired, (2) the basin lagtime, and (3) the <br />dimensionless hydro graph ordinates. In order to com- <br />pute the avemge, or design hydrograph using the NFF <br />procedures, the user selects the peak discharge from the <br />NFF frequency output. The user must also provide an <br />estimate of the basin lagtime. The NFF program then <br />computes the hydrograph using the dimensionless ordi- <br />nates of the hydrograph developed by Inman (1987) <br />which are stored in the program. <br />Basin Iagtime (LT) is defined as the elapsed time, <br />in hours, from the center of mass of rainfall excess to <br />the center of mass of the resultant runoff hydrograph. <br />This is the most difficult estimate to make for the <br />hydrograph computations. For rural basins, the user <br />must make an estimate of lagtime, independent of the <br />NFF program, because there are no lagtime equations <br />currently available in NFF for rural watersheds. How- <br />ever, Sauer (1989) has summarized basin lagtime equa- <br /> <br />tions that have been developed for rural and urban <br />watersheds in several States. The foIlowing statewide <br />equations computed for rural Georgia streams by <br />Inman (1987) are an example: <br /> <br />LT = 4.64 A'49 SL-.21 (North of faIl line) <br />LT = 13.6 A'43SL",31 (South of fall line) <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />A is drainage area, in square miles, and <br /> <br />SL is channel slope, in feet per mile, as defined <br />earlier. <br /> <br />Appendix C includes a summary of equations for esti- <br />mating basin lagtime as given by Sauer (1989) plus a <br />few other known studies. <br /> <br />. <br />- <br />i <br />, <br /> <br />On the other hand, the following generalized <br />equation was developed by Sauer and others (1983) for <br />urban basins for use on a nationwide basis: <br /> <br />LT = O.OO3V71 (I3_BDF).34 (ST+IO)2.53 Rl2.,44 <br />IA-.20 SL",14 <br /> <br />I <br />'~ <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />LT is basin lagtime, in hours, <br /> <br />L is the length, in miles, of the main channel <br />from the point of interest to the extension of the main <br />channel to the basin divide, and <br /> <br />BDF, ST, RI2, IA, and SL, are described in the <br />section "Urban Flood Frequency." <br /> <br />The standard error for the above lagtime equation is <br />+/- 61 percent, based on regression analysis for 170 <br />stations on a nationwide basis. For urban basins, the <br />user has a choice of using the nationwide lagtime <br />equation given above, or of inputting an independent <br />estimate of lagtime. <br /> <br />12 NlItlonwlde SUmlllllry 01 U.S. Geological Survey Reglonel Reg,..elon Equatlono lor Eotlllllltlng Mlgnltude Ind Frequency of <br />F_ 10< Un9"llod Sileo, 1993 <br />