Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~, <br /> <br />Rating curves must be established and checked periodically for each ofthe <br />streamflow monitoring locations. A rating curve is a theoretical relationship between <br />stream stage (measured by the sensor) and discharge. Rating curves should be <br />checked every 6 months. <br /> <br />In order to ensure that the data being collected is useful to other entities within the <br />City, quality assurance and quality control (QAlQC) activities will be designed and <br />initiated at the primary base station. Typically, the streamflow data requires the <br />greatest effort to check and to maintain a historical record of high quality. A <br />standard QAlQC procedure is to spend time at the end of each month checking all <br />streamflow and precipitation data for outliers, consistency among gages, and <br />consistency between precipitation and streamflow. The quality of this database is of <br />utmost importance because it will be used to help design future stormwater <br />improvements. <br /> <br />5. Annual Maintenance Cost: Approximately $2,500 per site. <br /> <br />The annual operation and maintenance cost associated with the implementation of <br />the early warning system is estimated to be $2,500 per site. In general, these costs <br />reflect the annual maintenance associated with the precipitation and stream gages <br />along with the time required to provide quality control of the data acquisition. <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />6. Discussion: <br /> <br />Damages associated with flooding can best be described as direct and indirect <br />damages. Direct damages generally relate to the loss of life and property. Property <br />damage is relatively straightforward to estimate while estimating the damage <br />associated with loss oflife is a more intangible issue. Indirect damages may include: <br />(a) damages sustained by non-floodprone businesses/activities when there are <br />physical or economic ties to floodprone businesses/activities; and (b) stress-induced <br />injuries or sickness of flooding victims as well as their families and friends. <br /> <br />Estimating both the direct and indirect damages is a very time-consuming. complex <br />task with requires substantial data. To simplify the damage estimate for this <br />application, the City focused on damages associated with loss oflife and property. <br />These damages have not been increased to account for the indirect damages <br />associated with flooding within the City. <br /> <br />In a similar manner, quantification of the project benefits relies on a reduction in the <br />loss of life and property afforded by the project. It is important to note, however, that <br />reduction in the loss of life and property will undoubtedly reduce the indirect <br />damages and increase the overall project benefits. Consequently, the benefits <br />identified in this application should represent a conservatively low estimate of total <br />benefits attributable to the implementation of the proposed project. <br /> <br />/""' <br /> <br />23 <br />