Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.he larger water-transported rock debris is <br />[leposited on the cone. The discharge of the <br />stream is also reduced in the course of its travel <br />down the cone as water seeps into the permeable' <br />bed material. From the base of the cone the <br />stream crosses the valley floor to empty into the <br />ocean. When southern California was first <br />settled, channels on the cones and in the alluvial <br />valleys were often poorly defined and <br />semipermanent, and during periods of flood, the <br />waters spread over wide flood plains. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />The rapid growth of California changed <br />conditions. On thousands of acres of alluvial <br />cones, old river bottoms, and flood plains, where <br />floodnows once ran relatively unconfined, there <br />are now homes, orchards, highways, railroads, <br />towns, and cities. The development has created a <br />complicated, if not unique, flood problem. <br />Flood hazards now are not confined to water <br />runoff alone but inelude debris that is brought <br />down the steep mountain slopes and is deposited <br />on streets and developed property. To some <br />.xtent the problem has been aggravated by <br />ncreased runoff and erosion in mountain areas <br />where erodible soils have been laid bare as a <br />result of forest and brush fires of both natural <br />and manmade origin. <br /> <br />I, <br />I <br />'l <br /> <br />A permanent solution to the problem is a <br />difficult one. Geologically speaking, the <br />mountains are young and break down rapidly <br />under the combined action of the elements. <br />Rcservoirs and debris basins fill with sediment <br />and rapidly lose their useful capacity. Storm <br />rainfall is often excessive and even such <br />tremendous floods as those of January 1916, <br />January 1934, March 1938, and January 1969 <br />may not be indicative of the maximum nood <br />potential. For example, the storm of January <br />21-23, 1943, was the most intense of record in <br />much of the region from a standpoint of <br />nood-producing potential. However, nooding <br />was not disastrous in 1943 because the rains fen <br />on dry ground that absorbed much of the <br />rainfall. There is no doubt that despite the <br />application of our most advanced hydrologic <br />.rinciples and nood-control practices, all <br /> <br />element of risk still exists for those who occupy <br />natural flood channels, nood plains, and alluvial <br />cones. However, without application of those <br />principles and practices, such occupancies are <br />virtually an invitation to future disaster. <br /> <br />Social and economic considerations <br />compound the nood problems associated with <br />the physical environment. The region has been <br />growing at a tremendous rate. For example, in <br />1935 the population of greater Los Angeles was <br />about 2.5 million; it is now about 7 million and <br />is still increasing. The pressure to provide <br />building sites to house the increasing population <br />and attendant industrial and commercial activity <br />places a great burden on city and county <br />planners. Furthermore, no direct central <br />planning authority exists for the heavily <br />urbanized areas because local jurisdiction over <br />planning resides in the many incorporated <br />communities. The local planning, although often <br />based on regional concepts, is not uniform in <br />quality. The number of municipalities has also <br />been increasing over the years. Using the Los <br />Angeles area again as an example, the number of <br />incorporated areas in Los Angeles County <br />increased by 75 percent between 1935 and the <br />present (1969) from 44 to 78. Many of these <br />municipalities are contiguous and form a <br />continuous urban sprawl. The difficulty of <br />planning on a regional scale to provide a logical <br />pattern of zoning to protect residents from the <br />hazards associated with storm and flood is <br />apparent. <br /> <br />FLOOD-CONTROL FACILITIES <br />IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />Local organizations, cities, counties, the <br />State, and the Federal Government have been, <br />and are, attempting to remedy the hazardous <br />nood situation through the following measures: <br /> <br />I. The construction of reservoirs designed to <br />store as much of the flood waters as possible. <br />2. The construction of debris basins to catch <br />debris and sediment that otherwise would be <br />deposited on the alluvial cones and valley noors. <br /> <br />B3 <br />