Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Water in the Urban Environment <br /> <br />Urban Sprawl and Flooding in Southern California <br /> <br />By S. E. Rantz <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />The floods of January 1969 in south-coastal <br />California provide a timely example of the effect of <br />urban sprawal on flood damage. Despite recordbreaking, <br />or near recordbreaking, stream discharges, damage was <br />minimal in the older developed areas that are protected <br />against inundation and debris damage by carefully <br />planned flood-control facilities, including debris basins <br />and flood-conveyance channels. By contrast, heavy <br />~mage occurred in areas of more -recent urban sprawl <br />where the hazards of inundation and debris or landslide <br />damage have not been taken into consideration, and <br />where the improvement and development of drainage or <br />f1ood.control facilities have not kept pace with <br />expanding urbanization. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Intense storms during the period January <br />l8-February 25,1969, produced <br />recordbreaking, or near record breaking floods in <br />southern California in late January and again in <br />late February. Particularly hard hit were the <br />urbanized areaS in the COastal region between <br />the Santa Ana and Santa Ynez Rivers (fig. I). <br />The loss of life and physical damage attributable <br />to the storms and ensuing floods in the report <br />area- 92 lives lost and an estimated physical <br />damage of $62 million in January alone-have <br />focused attention on the effect of urban sprawl <br />on flood damage. Urban sprawl is defined here <br />as the rapid expansion of suburban development <br />without complete planning for the optimum <br />.control and development of water and <br />associated land resources. The greatest damage <br /> <br />during the storms was sustained in areas of <br />urban sprawl where the hazards of inundation <br />and debris or landslide damage have not been <br />taken into consideration, and where the <br />improvement and development of drainage or <br />flood-control facilities have not kept pace with <br />expanded urbanization. <br /> <br />Because the floods in south-coastal California <br />provide a timely example of the effect of urban <br />sprawl, a brief case history of that region is <br />presented here. The discussions are related to <br />the floods of January 1969; the floods of <br />February 1969 were somewhat similar with <br />respect to both the magnitude of discharge and <br />the areal pattern of physical damage. <br /> <br />THE FLOOD PROBLEM IN <br />SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />To better understand the flood problem in <br />south-coastal California, one should be familiar <br />with the characteristics of the stream channels <br />and the floodflows they carry. The upper reach <br />of a typical stream channel occupies the floor of <br />a steep mountain canyon. At the mouth of the <br />canyon near the base of the mountain is a <br />well-developed alluvial cone, a cone being a <br />built-up slope of water-transported rock debris <br />that extends from the canyon mouth down to <br />the alluvial valley floor. Intense mountain <br />storms cause swift sediment-laden streamflow in <br />the canyon. When the streamflow reaches the <br />flatter alluvial cone its velocity is reduced and <br /> <br />BI <br />