Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Hydrology was developed using future land use imperviousness and existing channel conditions, <br />The 5,790-acre basin was divided into 70 sub-basins for an average size of 82 acres. These sub- <br />, <br />basins were delineated from the 200 scale, 2-foot contour interval topography provided by <br />Landmark Mapping, Ltd. (1990), Figure 6 gives sub-basin delineations, routing elements and <br />design point location, The SWMM flow chart, Figures 7 and 8 are included which schematically <br />depicts the routing model. Table 5 is a tabulation of the input parameters used in the CUHPE <br />computer model, and Table 6 provides an input data listing for the SWMM computer model. <br /> <br />For the purposes of this study, the roads, railroads, reservoirs and irrigation ditches were <br />neglected as obstructions to the drainage path, These structures were not analyzed as "flow <br />attenuation" facilities. Only the two detention ponds located along the southwest side of the <br />Burlington Northern Railroad embankment were included in the SWMM model. These ponds <br />are owned and maintained by the City of Louisville. <br /> <br />For the future conditions hydrology, the CUHP and SWMM models were developed to reflect <br />the proposed changes anticipated within Bullhead Gulch watershed, For the CURP model, a <br />land-use percent impervious value reflecting wning map projections was used, The time of <br />concentration (for basins of 90 acres or less) was determined using the formula 1" = L/l80 + 10 <br />= minutes. For the SWMM model, the channel geometry for the routing elements was <br />established based on discussions with the District. An incised low flow channel was added to <br />the model in order to simulate the natural erosion process of channel bottoms as a sub-basin <br />becomes urbanized, The geometry of the low flow channel was approximated, based on a <br />carrying capacity of 10 - 20 percent of the future conditions loo-year runoff. In addition, the <br />overflow channel side slopes were set at a maximum of 20 (horizontal) to I (vertical), <br /> <br />FLOOD HAZARD AREA DEUNEATION <br />BUWlEAD GULCH AND lRIBUTARIES <br /> <br />FINAL <br />7/31/91 <br /> <br />7 <br />