My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07696
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:24 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:09:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Prowers
Bent
Otero
Community
Southeastern Colorado
Stream Name
Arkansas River
Basin
Arkansas
Title
The Arkansas River Flood of June 3-5, 1921
Date
1/1/2022
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
USDOI
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PREVIOUS k'LOODS, <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />present steel works were wasnecl away. No loss of life was re- <br />portedo No records of precipitation covering the period of the flood <br />are available. <br />A flood during May, 1867, caused the removal of Fort Lyon to a <br />point 17 miles farther west. The rainfall for May was 4.84 inches, <br />as compared with a normal of 2 inches. <br />During a flood in, June, 18119, the riveI', it is said, contained an im- <br />mense amount of water. <br />The files of the Pueblo Chieftain contfLin notes concerning several <br />floods during 1875, of which the largest was on September 16 and <br />was caused by heavy ruins. The following statement concerning this <br />flood is taken from the Las Animas Leadler of September 18 and 25, <br />1875:13 <br /> <br />Ori September 16 a rush of water came down from Purgatory River at Las <br />Animas, Colo, The water was 5 feet higher than at any previous time' that <br />year. The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Coo's tracks were under water for one- <br />half mile on each side of the Purgator~o, the bridge being 3 to 4 feet under water, <br />At Fort Lyon the water was 4 feet higher than ever known before. The bottom <br />land betwet'n the bridge and the post trader's (a distance of three-fourths of a <br />mile) was a swift, raging flood. Up the Purgatory considerable damage was <br />donp, the greatest losses being of conlwood, ~;tacked hayo pattie, fences. an,1 <br />adobe houses, The Arlmnsas above the mouth of the Purgatory was also ill <br />flood at this time, there being relX>rts of damage as far up as Pueolo, Th" <br />Aplshapa brought In a large amount of this water, Rn,l the f!oo,1 height was thp <br />higheRt in 15 J~ears. <br /> <br />This flood could not have been unusually high in the upper river, <br />as the Pueblo papers did not give any gll'eat space to it. <br />Some minor floods occur'red during July a.nd August, 1880, and <br />August, 1881. For 1880 the few available rainfall records show <br />nearly twice the normal amount during the flood months, and for <br />1881 the Pi!,es Peak record showed nearly three times the normal <br />rainfall during August, <br />A flood of considerable magnitude in the Arkansas and Purgatoire <br />near Las Animas occurred July 20-25, 1886. The rainfall at Las <br />Animas was 3.36 inches during July 24 and 25 and 4.66 incheso for the <br />month, or more than twice tho normal. This flood was not severe at <br />Pueblo,. a.s the newly established gaging station showed a maximum <br />of only 3,080 second-feet on July 21. Tho rainfall at Pueblo for July <br />was only 0.39 incho <br />The next flood recorded was that of August 10, 1889. The Denver <br />Republican of that date sta.ted that rain began falling about 5,30 p. m, <br />August 9 (I,nd flooded the region around Pueblo. The issue of August <br />11 stated that" a terrible and disastrous rainstorm visited Florence <br />August 9 in the evening, lasting two hours. The Denver & Rio <br /> <br />13 Mcckm-. R. 1.. Purgatory River flood: U. S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Papf'f 147. <br />p. 165, ]HQ5. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.