<br />-~
<br />,
<br />~
<br />,
<br />,
<br />i
<br />
<br />\ ,
<br />1'..'.0--.
<br />''-~' - .
<br />\ ~',-
<br />Ik.
<br />'L~'-;'
<br />~l.l. ,<,:
<br />
<br />'. :
<br />
<br />.'.f
<br />
<br />~. .
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />J
<br />f
<br />1:
<br />L.
<br />
<br />i
<br />
<br />THE FLOOD AT PUEBLO.
<br />
<br />27
<br />
<br />,Tune 3, and because the area inundated was so wide it was impossibk
<br />to make discharge measurements during the peak flow. A Her the
<br />flood the United States Geological Survey determined the maximum
<br />discharge as 103,000 second-feet. (See p. 20.)
<br />An idea of the unprecedented discharge of the river during the
<br />flood is given by the following table showing the available records or
<br />maximum discharge:
<br />
<br />Annual ma3Jimum discharge of A,rlcutr.sG.9 River at Pueblo for certain vear.'?
<br />
<br />Dis- II Year. Date. I Dis-
<br />charge. charge.
<br />Sream!- Secf}nd~
<br />feet. feet,
<br />4,530 1907.........,:,.... July 28. m......... 4,G-l
<br />7660 1908. 0....,........0 Juno 1.'}-16........ 1,9?
<br />0'520 1909... ............0 Aug. UL.......... 5,
<br />39:100 19100.... ,....... ... Julle1............ S,
<br />5,000 1911... '..0.0.... ,., JulyO............, 7,rx
<br />3,440.. 1912. 0 ,.....0......0 June9.... ""'." 10,lX
<br />3,750 1913:.. .............. July2.'L........... 7,80<
<br />5,3&! Itl14. ............... Allg.3............ 7,
<br />4,890 1915.. .............. 1une24........... 17,OC
<br />6980 19160.. ............. June 17.'.. ........ 8,
<br />10:700 1917. ..........,.... June 13........... 6,
<br />8,320 1918,'.0.,..........0 lune2:L........__ 9,
<br />6,100 1919., .............0 M.y30.....0...... 5
<br /> ,
<br />3,310 1920......,......,.. June 10...... ..... 4,&
<br />6,460 1921., .............. Juno3.... ... ._... l():\
<br />4,880
<br />
<br />Year.
<br />
<br />Date.
<br />
<br />1885... ............. June 5. _.... ......
<br />1886..........,..... M.y29.o......,...
<br />1887 ................ July 18...0........
<br />1894.....0...0....,. M.y 31.....,......
<br />1895.. ............. 'I' July 31............
<br />1896..........,..... Aug,180..........
<br />1897. _. ............. lune 2.... .... .._.
<br />1898...........0.... July 13...,.......,
<br />1899... ... ........_. JWle 20.... .......
<br />1900...0.....0. ..... June 2... 0 ...,....
<br />1901......0......... May 21............
<br />1900... ............. Aug. 5... ,.,......,
<br />1903.. _ ..._......... June 9. ... .........
<br />1004... ............. JW1C 15.... .......
<br />100.')... ...... ....... June 10.... .......
<br />1906.. 0 ............. June H... ........
<br />
<br />0,-
<br />lO,
<br />8(J(),
<br />000
<br />~.
<br />~
<br />)
<br />500
<br />~
<br />900
<br />800
<br />600
<br />230
<br />~
<br />000
<br />
<br />. ,
<br />
<br />NOTE.-For 1901 and from 1909 t.o 1920 the discharge is that tor the ma:timum stage recorded. For
<br />the other years the maximum discharge is that'for the 24-h(lur period.
<br />
<br />-
<br />TOTAL DISCHARGI,.
<br />
<br />, 'the recording, gage at Pueblo was destroyed by the flood, and no
<br />: con~inuous record of river height exists. From the testimony of local
<br />i observers and from high-wllter marks it has been possible to ,con-
<br />struct a fairly complete and accurate hydrograph of the Arkansas at
<br />'Pueblo from June 2 to I),(fig. 1). The most complete record of the
<br />river during the time of the principal rise' was that obtained hy MI'.
<br />B. Milton Stearns, assistant chief train dispatcher of the Denver &
<br />Rio Grande Railroad. As the water rose in the Union Depot the
<br />distance to the water surface from a flxed point was measured with 'L
<br />level rod and the time noted. This was done at frequent intervals
<br />from 9 p. m. on the 3d to '"{ a. m. on the 4th, the period during which
<br />the river was above the floor of the Union Depot. The reference
<br />points used were latercomiected to the city datum by level, and -the
<br />maximum stage was found to be at 4,t>84.75 fEEt above the sea. Tiie
<br />maximum stage at' th:e:ri~e~ g>f x~: (fie Main Street bridge ~~,s
<br />determined after 'thli' flood, from a well-defined water. mark on -t~e
<br />outside of the new'dity'hh1J,150 feet distant. This mark was found
<br />to be 24.66 feet above the zero 'of the gage, or 4,681.70 feet aboye the
<br />sea, 3.05 feet lower thim the maximum observed at the Unipn Depot.
<br />
|