Laserfiche WebLink
<br />86 GROUNDWATER PUMPING TESTS <br />Table 5.2. Database for Case Study 5.2 <br />Time After Weill Time After Well 2 <br />Pumping Adjuated Pumping Adjusted <br />Started Drawdown Started Drawdown <br /> (min) (ft) (min) (ft) <br /> 5 1.00 2 4.60 <br /> 6 1.19 3 4.97 <br /> 7 1.25 4 5.32 <br /> 8 1.43 5 5.65 <br /> 9 1.58 6 5.91 <br /> 10 1.72 7 6.08 <br /> 12 1.94 8 6.20 <br /> 15 2.32 9 6.33 <br /> 18 2.64 10 6.50 <br /> 20 2.85 15 7.62 <br /> 25 3.26 20 8.21 <br /> 30 3.61 25 8.75 <br /> 40 4.42 30 9.23 <br /> 50 5.00 40 10.02 <br /> 60 5.51 50 10.55 <br /> 71 6.12 60 11.25 <br /> 80 6.50 70 11.74 <br /> 90 6.91 80 12.21 <br /> 100 7.28 90 12.54 <br /> 152 8.91 100 12.80 <br /> 195 9.90 150 14.35 <br /> 254 11.15 195 15.38 <br /> 300 fi.64 255 16.57 <br /> 360 12.60 300 17.14 <br /> 360 17.78 <br /> <br />CASE STUDIES 87 <br /> <br />locations of the image wells, and therefore the barrier <br />boundaries, cannot be determined with test data alone. <br />Logs of wells indicate that the aquifer occurs as a fill in a <br />buried valley in shale bedrock. Based on pumping test and <br />geologic data, the barrier boundaries were located at posi- <br />tions east and west of the production well. The boundaries <br />represent a rectangular section which is equivalenthydrau- <br />lically to the real aquifer system. <br />Calculations for the observation wells are as follows: <br /> <br />Observation Welll <br /> <br />Q '" 62 gpm, r = 165 ft, m = 8 ft <br />Match Pt. Coord. W(u) = 1.0, l/u = 1.0, s = 1.45 ft <br />t=2min <br /> <br />T = 1.146 X 10'(62) 1.0/1.45 T = 4900 gpdIft <br />S = 4.9 X 103(1.0)2/[2.693 X 1()3(165)'] S = 0.000134 <br /> <br />Su = 1.0 ft, <br /> <br />tu = 44 min <br /> <br />of the second and third type curve traces were used to <br />determine the distances from the observation wells to the <br />second barrier boundary image well. <br />The distances from each observation well to the image <br />wells were scribed as arcs from the respective observation <br />wells. Theoretically, the arcs should intersect at common <br />points, but the real aquifer is not a vertically bounded aqui- <br />fer (as assumed in the image well theory), and as a result <br />the arcs and their intersections are dispersed. In addition, <br />only two observation wells are available, so that the exact <br /> <br />Wiuu) = 4.9 X 103(1.0)/[1.146 X 10'(62)) <br />W(uu) = 0.6896 <br /> <br />11;1 = 4.12 X 10-1 <br /> <br />ru = ([4.9 X 103(44)4.12 X 10-'V <br />[2.693 X 103(1.34 X lO-'))}1f.! <br /> <br />ru = 496 ft <br /> <br />s" = 1.0 ft, t" = 154 min <br /> <br />W(u,,) = 0.6896, Ui2 = 4.12 X 10-1 <br /> <br />r" "" ([4.9 X 103(154)4.12 X 10.1]1 <br />[2.693 X 103(1.34 X 1O-4))}ln <br /> <br />r" = 928 ft <br /> <br />Observation Well 2 <br /> <br />Q = 62 gpm, r = 20 ft, m = 8 ft <br /> <br />Match Pt. Coord. W(u) '" 1.0, l/u '" 100, s = 1.45 <br />ft t =5.6 min <br />