Laserfiche WebLink
<br />102 GROUNDWATER PUMPING TESTS <br /> <br />CASE STUDIES 103 <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Table 5.8. Database for Case Study 5.8 <br /> <br />Distance Adjusted Drawdown <br />(ft) (ft) <br /> <br />28 1.68 <br />85 1.22 <br />230 .83 <br />420 .56 <br /> <br />2.0 <br /> <br />C,., = (0.72/0.27 - 1.59/0.62)/(0.62 + 0.27) <br />C,., = 0.11 sec'/ft' <br /> <br /> I.S <br />..... <br />u.. <br />c 1.0 <br />. <br />0 <br />"0 <br />. <br />0 <br />L <br />Cl O. S <br /> <br /> <br />The average value of the well loss coefficient is 0.08 sec'l <br />ft'. Well loss at the 1400 gpm rate was calculated to be 0.77 <br />ft and amounted to about 10% of the total drawdown in the <br />production well. <br /> <br />0.0 <br />10 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />INDUCED STREAMBED INFILTRATION <br /> <br />Distance eFt> <br />Figure 5.9. Distance-drawdown graph for Case Study 5.8. <br /> <br />A pumping test was conducted in Case Study 5.8 on <br />February 20-23, 1956, using a group of six wells located <br />along the Mad River about 4 miles northwest of the city of <br />Springfield, Ohio (see Walton, 1963). Wells were located <br />400 ft west of Mad River. Observation wells were located <br />28, 85, 230, and 420 ft north from a production well. Logs of <br />wells and test holes indicate that the 100-ft-thick aquifer <br />consists of coarse sand and gravel, is about 4000 ft wide, <br />and trends southwest to northeast through the pumping <br />test site. The constant pumping rate was 1034 gpm and the <br />test duration was 4310 minutes. Distance-drawdown data <br />for observation wells at the end of the test when steady <br />state conditions prevailed are presented in Table 5.8. <br />A straight line was drawn through the semilogarithmic <br />distance-drawdown graph and aquifer transmissivity was <br />calculated to be 547,000 gpdift. The recharging image well <br />simulating induced streambed infiltration was located at a <br />distance of 1372 ft from the production well. Aquifer <br /> <br />specific yield is 0.01 and depletion of streamflow at the end <br />of the test was 960 gpm or about 93% of the discharge rate. <br />The reach of the streambed within the area of influence of <br />pumping was calculated to be 8000 ft and the average <br />width of the streambed is 82 ft. The streambed area of <br />induced infiltration is 656,000 square ft. The induced <br />infiltration rate is 9.2 X 10' gpdiacre. The average <br />drawdown beneath the streambed was calculated to be 0.09 <br />ft. The induced infiltration rate per ft of head loss is 1.0 X <br />10' gpd/acre/ft at a surface water temperature of 390F. The <br />streambed induced infiltration rate is in the clogged slow <br />sand filter category (see Walton, 1970, p. 266). Well storage <br />capacity and delayed gravity yield impacts were negligible <br />at the end of the test. Calculations are as follows: <br /> <br />Q = 1034 gpm, <br />T = 52811034)/1.0 <br /> <br />s, = 1.0 ft <br />T = 545,952 gpd/ft <br /> <br />The distance.drawdown graph is presented in Figure 5.9. <br />