Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Economic Feasibility <br />Damage reduced through the use of zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations, and <br />building and housing codes is measured as the difference in damage with and without <br />implementation of the ordinance, regulation, or code. Since these regulatory means are <br />directed principally toward future development, the with condition must be estimated based on <br />a judgement as to how much, what type, and how future development will be affected. This can <br />only be done by evaluating each individual flood plain and community. In this study no attempt <br />was made to estimate damage reduced. In general, it is felt that if the necessary basic <br />engineering data is available or can be obtained at a reasonable cost, and there will not be a <br />significant loss of tax revenue, then all of these regulatory means will prove economically <br />feasible. <br /> <br />Advantages and Disadvantages <br />Table 11-1 summarizes the major advantages and disadvantages of zoning, regulations, and <br />codes. <br /> <br />TABLE 11-1 <br /> <br />ADV ANT AGES AND DISADVANTAGES <br />OF ZONING ORDINANCES, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS <br />AND BUILDING AND HOUSING CODES <br /> <br />Advantages <br /> <br />An effective means of bringing about the <br />proper use of flood plain lands. Economic, <br />environmental, and social values can be <br />integrated with the recognized flood hazard. <br /> <br />Helps to keep flood damage from increasing. <br />8y addressing non-conforming uses they can <br />be helpful in achieving the necessary land <br />use adjustments to mitigate existing flood <br />problems. <br /> <br />Can be effective over time on existing <br />improper development, or additions and <br />modifications to existing property. <br /> <br />Disadvantages <br /> <br />Not effective in reducing flood damage to <br />existing structures. <br /> <br />Subject to variance or amendment by local <br />governmental bodies which can reduce <br />effectiveness considerably. <br /> <br />Tend to treat all flood plain property equally <br />when in fact various economic factors may <br />make one type of development more <br />appropriate for one portion of the flood <br />plain and another type more appropriate <br />elsewhere. <br /> <br />References <br /> <br />1. U.S. Water Resources Council, "Regulation of Flood Hazard Areas to Reduce Flood Losses", <br />Volume 1, Parts I - IV and Volume 2, Parts V - VI, 1971. <br /> <br />2. U.S. Army Engineers, "Guidelines for Flood Damage Reduction", Pamphlet prepared by the <br />Sacramento District, 1976. . <br /> <br />3. U.S. Army Engineers, "A Perspective on Flood Plain Regulations for Flood Plain <br />Management", Engineering Pamphlet 1165-2-304, 1 June 1976. <br /> <br />87 <br />