Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE 9-1 <br /> <br />ESTIMATED COST TO ELEVATE A <br />NEW STRUCTURE ON FILL OR COLUMNS <br /> <br />Item Estimated Cost Estimated Cost <br /> to Elevate 3 Feet' to Elevate 5 Feet' <br />I ncreased Cost to Elevate $1760. $2400. <br />Total First Cost $1760. $2400. <br />Annual Cost' $ 142. $ 193. <br />Annual Cost as Percentage of 0.5 .6 <br />Structure Value <br /> <br />1 Based on an estimate of $1.10 per square foot for a 1600 square foot, $30,000 structure. <br />2 Amortized at 7 percent over 30 years. <br />3 Based on an estimate of $1.50 per square foot for a 1600 square foot, $30,000 structure. <br /> <br />Economic Feasibility <br />When a new structure is elevated to some higher elevation, damage is reduced by eliminating <br />damage which otherwise would occur below the elevated elevation. At a lower el~vation <br />damage would occur when inundated by less frequent floods, while at a higher elevation these <br />floods would not cause damage if they are below the raised height. Damage reduced is the <br />difference in damage with and without the structure elevated. Th~ without condition depends <br />upon local regulation of flood plain land. In the absence of any regulations a property owner <br />may choose to locate a structure at any flood plain elevation desired. Under the National Flood <br />Insurance Program new structures are required to locate at or above the 100 year flood <br />elevation. The without condition elevation then is based upon one of these two conditions, or <br />some other conditions, if for example a variance were granted. The with condition elevation is <br />the elevation to which the new structure is being raised. Economic feasibility is determined by <br />comparing damage r~duced by raising a structure a certain number of feet to the cost to do the <br />raising. <br /> <br />Figures 9-2 through 9-9 show expected annual damage reduced for new type structures <br />raised three feet and five feet respectively. Damage reduced is to structure and contents. These <br />data were computed by first computing expected annual damage at a base elevation (100.0 feet), <br />then computing damage with each structure raised three feet and five feet (103.0 and 105.0 feet <br />respectively). Results of this analysis show damage reduced varies by type structure, flood <br />hazard factor, and location in the flood plain. <br /> <br />The annual cost for raising a structure three feet, expressed as a percentage of structure value <br />(0.5 percent in Tabl~ 9-1) is plotted on Figures 9-2 through 9-5. A comparison with damage <br />reduced for each type structure shows that the cost is exceeded for all locations in the flood <br />plain, all flood hazard factors and all type structures. <br /> <br />65 <br />