Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Greater valued structures are likely to require additional iands.cape and aesthetic work to make <br />them compatible with the site. In thh situation, increased costs may be offset by increased value <br />and the percentage may not be too different. <br /> <br />TABLE 4-1 <br /> <br />ESTIMATED COST TO RAISE AN EXISTING STRUCTURE IN-PLACE' <br /> <br />Item <br /> <br />Estimated Cost <br /> <br />Brace and Load Structure <br />. Disconnect, reconnect utilities <br /> <br />$3,200. <br /> <br />Extend Existing Foundation <br /> <br />Reconstruct Porches, Ramps and Stairs, <br />Relandscape <br /> <br />2,500. <br /> <br />Total First Cost <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />2,050. <br />$7,750. <br />$ 621. <br />2.1 <br /> <br />Annual Cost' <br /> <br />Annual Cost as Percent of <br />Structu re Val ue <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />, Estimated for a 1,600 square foot, $30,000 structure without basement, on raised foundation. <br />Height raised assumed to be 3 feet. Costs include 25 percent for contractor's bonds, overhead, <br />profit, and engineering. <br />2 Amortized at 7 percent for 30 years. <br /> <br />Economic Feasibility <br />Raising a structure without basement reduces damage caused by flood events below the <br />raised first floor elevation. Residual damage still remains for flood events above the raised first <br />floor elevation and some minor damage may occur to the underside of the first floor flooring. <br />Analysis of damage reduced by raising a structure three feet and five feet was made in Appendix <br />A. Results of this analysis are presented in Figures 4-2 through 4-5. A structure was assumed to <br />be raised three and five feet for the conditions indicated and zero damage was assumed to <br />occur below the first floor. Damage reduced was computed as the difference in expected <br />annual damage with and without the structure raised. The curves show considerable variability <br />depending on the type structure and event at the first floor. <br /> <br />An estimate of economic feasibility was made by plotting the estimated cost of raising a <br />structure three feet and five feet on the respective Figures. <br /> <br />The estimated minimum cost for raising a structure three feet was 2.1 percent from Table 4-1. <br />It was assumed the cost to raise a structure five feet would be 25 percent more or approximately <br />2.6 percent. When compared with expected annual damage reduced these data indicate that for <br />one story, no basement structures, raising a structure three feet or five feet is generally feasible <br />below the 10 year flood plain, not likely to be feasible above the 15 year flood plain, and <br /> <br />24 <br />