Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~' <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />~ <br />\ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />\ <br />I <br />( <br />( <br />( <br />( <br />( <br /><: <br /> <br />0: <br />( <br />, <br />, <br />l <br />.; <br />I <br />( <br />l <br />" <br />( <br />l <br />( <br />i <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />f <br />( <br />I <br />I <br />( <br />~ <br />( <br />( <br />( <br />I' <br />i <br />I <br />l. <br />, <br /> <br /> TABLE A-1 <br /> 1970 FIA DEPTH-DAMAGE DATA <br /> MODIFIED' , 3 <br /> Damage in Percentage of Structure Value <br /> 1SNB 2SNB 1SWB 2SWB <br />Depth (feet) Str Con Str Con Str Con Str Con <br />-8.0 O. O. O. O. <br />-1.0 O. O. <br />0.0 4. O. 2. O. 6. 8. 5. 5. <br />0.1 8. 5. 4. 5. 10. 21. 7. 10. <br />1.0 22. 35. 10. 16. 24. 40. 14. 22. <br />2.0 30. 50. 16. 28. 31. 58. 21. 34. <br />3.0 35. 60. 20. 37. 37. 70. 26. 43. <br />4.0 39. 68. 24. 43. 41. 76. 30. 48. <br />5.0 41. 74. 27. 47. 44. 80. 33. 51. <br />6.0 44. 78. 30. 49. 46. 82. 35. 52. <br />7.0 46. 81. 32. 50. 48. 83. 38. 53. <br />8.0 48. 83. 34. 51. 49. e 85. 40. 56. <br />9.0 50. 85. 39. 55. 50. 44. 59. <br />10.0 42. 58. 46. 64. <br />11.0 45. 65. 47. 71. <br />12.0 47. 72. 48. 76. <br />13.0 49. 78. 49. 78. <br />14.0 50. 79. 50. 79. <br />15.0 80. 80. <br /> 81. 81. <br /> <br />1 Data are modified slightly below 0.1 ft. from those in Reference 1, to approximate the percent damage distribution <br />indicated by the Huntington District data, <br /> <br />2 These are the data used in most analyses in this study. <br /> <br />3 Damage values use total value based on replacement cost (5). <br /> <br />A-3 <br /> <br />- <br />