My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07643
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07643
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:12:22 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:07:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Physical and Economic Feasibility of Nonstructural Flood Plain Management Measures
Date
3/1/1978
Prepared For
US
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Costs <br />Costs of acquisition in fee or easement depend upon the cost per acre and number of acres <br />needed. Both items are highly variable and must be determined on a case by case basis, Per unit <br />costs can vary considerably within a community, between communities, and regionally. The <br />number of acres needed depends upon the plan - it may require a few acres or thousands of <br />acres. Administrative costs - costs to acquire land - are generally small compared with the <br />cost of the land or easement itself. <br /> <br />Economic Feasibility <br />Acquisition, either by fee or easement, reduces damage by controlling future use. With <br />acquisition there will, hopefully, be less damageable property exposed to the flood hazard than <br />without. The difference in damage with and without will measure the damage reduced. The <br />accuracy of this measurement is tied to the accuracy of estimating future land use for both <br />conditions. This can best be done for specific flood plains. No attempt was made in this study to <br />estimate damage reduced on a generai basis. <br /> <br />Advantages and Disadvantages <br />Several advantages and disadvantages of acquisition are summarized in Table 12-1. <br /> <br />TABLE 12-1 <br /> <br />ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES <br />OF THE USE OF PUBLIC ACQUISITION OF FLOOD PLAIN LAND <br />TO REDUCE FLOOD DAMAGE <br /> <br />Advantages <br /> <br />Provides control of land and its use with fee <br />title. <br /> <br />Provides control of certain land uses with an <br />easement, but without the burden of fee <br />title. <br /> <br />Disadvantages <br /> <br />Does not reduce existing damage. <br /> <br />Requires land management and mainte- <br />nance by the public owner. <br /> <br />References <br />1. Mack, Ruth, "Evaluation of and Recommendations for Legal, Institutional and Financial <br />Methods for Implementing Purposes and Plans for Flood Plain Management in the Connecticut <br />River Basin", Institute of Public Administration, New York, March 1976, (NTIS PB-253 122). <br /> <br />2. U.S. Army Engineers, "Charles River, Massachusetts, Main Report and Attachments", New <br />England Division, Waltham, Mass., May 1972. <br />3. Bauer Engineering, "Living with a River in Suburbia", A Report to the Forest Preserve <br />District of DuPage County, Chicago, Illinois, 1976. <br /> <br />91 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.