Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SECT! ON VI <br />WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS 1984 STUDY <br /> <br />The two subsequent studies were similar to the previous two studies (12,000 <br />cfs and 8,500 cfsl, except that here the Crestline Bridge was removed from the <br />model. In addition, for the 8,500 cfs discharge, minor cleanup along the left <br />bank, just upstream of the Bowles Avenue Bridge and cleanup of the banks under <br />the bridge, were included in the model. <br /> <br />The floodplain and floodway analysis of the South Platte River in the vicinity <br />of Bowles Avenue in Littleton was commenced in May 1984. The work was under- <br />taken for the Writer Corporation of Denver, Colorado after receiving clearance <br />to perform the assignment from the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br />and the City of Littleton. <br /> <br />For all modelling, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering <br />Center computer model HEC-2 was utilized. <br /> <br />The WWE 1984 Study commenced with a review of previous floodplain delineation <br />engineering and after conferring with engineering personnel who had performed <br />the previous work. <br /> <br />In the analyses, floodways were determined based on equal loss of conveyance. <br />Starting elevations were obtained by developing a rating curve at the Belle- <br />view Avenue Bridge based on previous studies. All bridge pier coefficients, <br />expansion and contraction coefficients, weir coefficients, and total loss <br />coefficients were based on the recommendations in the HEC-2 Users Manual. <br /> <br />The topographic mapping of the District was utilized after expanding the cov- <br />erage to include the full floodplain area. The mapping uses two-foot contours <br />and was originally checked to insure conformance with national mapping stan- <br />dards. <br /> <br />A summary of studies performed by Wright Water Engineers is presented below. <br /> <br />Study A: 12,000 cfs flood; existing conditions; floodplain and <br />floodway delineation <br /> <br />Roughness factors for the channel were determined using field surveys of the <br />profile of a discharge in the river of 1700 cfs. Overbank roughness factors <br />were field estimated. All roughness factors were checked against those used <br />in previous flood studies and found to be in conformance. <br /> <br />Study B: 8,500 cfs flood; existing conditions; floodplain and floodway delin- <br />eation <br /> <br />Study C: Crestline Bridge removed, flow rate of 12,000 cfs <br /> <br />The WWE 1984 Study was first directed to utilizing a flood discharge of 12,000 <br />cfs to check with previous flood studies. This, in effect, was a calibration <br />effort to determine Where similarities and differences existed. The flood- <br />plain ands floodway are shown in an Overlay in the packet. <br /> <br />Study D: Crestline Bridge removed with improvements at the Bowles Avenue <br />Bridge, flow rate of 8,500 cfs <br /> <br />The second part of the effort was to determine the floodplain and floodway un- <br />der existing conditions using a flood discharge of 8,500 cfs. The results of <br />this analysis are shown on an Overlay in the packet. Table VI-1 displays the <br />floodplain and floodway data for the lOa-year floodplain using an 8,500 cfs <br />di sch arge. <br />