Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Major costs in the procedures described above <br />are involved in mobilization and demobiliza- <br />tion of this equipment. Some reductions in <br />the cost per residence can be realized if work <br />on more than one structure can be undertaken <br />within a reasonably limited area and within a <br />limited time. The sample cost estimates <br />assign these mobilization costs to one struc- <br />ture. <br />These cost estimates were derived <br />from various sources, primarily the Coastal <br />Construction Manual, and Means Site Work <br />Cost Data 1988.' <br />The cost estimates reflect 1988 price <br />levels in the Houston-Galveston area of the <br />Texas gulf co~st. The estimates are intended <br />only to indicate the general range of costs <br />involved in a slab raising project for compari- <br />son with other possible flood protection <br />measures or with new construction, and <br />should not be used as a basis for estimates for <br />specific projects. Costs in addition to those <br />shown would be incurred for landscaping, and <br />for temporary housing during the construction <br />if the work prevented remaining in residence <br />during the process. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Raising and moving a slab-on-grade <br />structure with the slab attached is both practi- <br />cal and cost effective when undertaken by <br />competent, experienced, and adequately <br />equipped structural movers. In some cases the <br />procedure may provide the only practical <br />flood proofing option. Each structure will <br />have highly individual engineering and archi- <br />tectural characteristics effecting economic <br />feasibility and aesthetic desirability. Some <br />advantages of this procedure include: <br />It may permit continued occupancy <br />and use of the structure during the process; It <br />avoids or simplifies interior shoring and brac- <br />ing, and better preserves the structural integ- <br /> <br />rity of the building; The technique is appli- <br />cable to some construction materials not <br />otherwise feasible to move or raise, such as <br />concrete block. <br />This procedure deserves serious con- <br />sideration as a practical non structural flood <br />protection measure. <br /> <br />I. United States Water Resources Council, <br />Floodplain Management Handbook, <br />September, 1981, p. 20. <br /> <br />2. Relocation of a Large, Slab-On-Grade <br />House from a Flood Plain to a Flood Free <br />Site, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tulsa <br />District, 1984. <br /> <br />3. Coastal Construction Manual, Federal <br />Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-55/ <br />February 1986. <br /> <br />4. Coastal Construction Manual, p. F-1 <br /> <br />5. Coastal Construction Manual, pp. F2 - F4 <br /> <br />6. Coastal Construction Manual, p. F-6 <br /> <br />7. Coastal Construction Manual, p. F-7 <br /> <br />8. Means Site Work Cost Data 1988, R. S. <br />Means Company, Inc., Kingston, MA, 1987. <br /> <br />8 <br />