Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Analysis of Insurance Premiums <br /> <br />Given that Jersey Shore is in the Regular Program of the <br />National Flood Insurance Program, it was assumed that <br />each building would be insured against flood losses at <br />actuarial rates, In addition it was assumed that each <br />building would be insured to the maximum value allowed <br />under the rules and regulations of the National Flood <br />Insurance Program, i,e" $200,000 for the structure and <br />$200,000 for the contents," <br /> <br />The rates used were those for a two-story non-residen- <br />tial structure with no basement and were taken from rate <br />tables included in the Flood Insurance Manual pub- <br />lished by the National Flood Insurers Association." The <br />rates are correlated to the elevation of the flood proofed <br />level of each building, The rates for the basic building <br />and the wet flood proofed building, both at grade, were <br />taken for the -6 foot elevation, those for the building <br />partially raised on fill and equipped for watertight closure <br />were taken for the base flood (0) elevation, those forthe <br />building raised on fill were taken for the + 1 foot eleva- <br />tion, and those for the building elevated on columns <br />were taken for the +6 foot elevation, The rate tables <br />used are included in Appendix A, <br /> <br />In accordance with the policies of the National Flood <br />Insurers Association, an administrative fee of $15 was <br />added to the first layer premium because actuarial rates <br />were used in determining the premium.13 Both the <br />Pennsylvania servicing company14 for the flood insur- <br />ance program and the assistant director of community <br />operations at the National Flood Insurers Association <br />were contacted to corroborate the correct interpretation <br />of the instructions contained in the Flood Insurance <br />Manual, <br /> <br />Calculating a reduction in flood insurance premiums was <br />considered one way of estimati ng the benefit of flood <br />proofing, A benefit/cost ratio for each building type other <br />than the basic building was determined by dividing the <br />present value of the reduction in annual insurance pre- <br />miums by the increase in building costs of each flood <br />proofed building, <br /> <br />Analysis of Flood Loss Potential <br /> <br />Expected flood losses were calculated on an average <br />annual basis, The methodology followed was that used <br />by the U,S, Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) in the cal- <br />culation of stage damage potential." Base data were <br />taken from Corps stage damage calculations for Jersey <br />Shore, which were derived from 1963 flood stage <br />records at the Lock Haven Dam upstream of Jersey <br />Shore and damages incurred with the 1972 Tropical <br />Storm Agnes disaster.'. The Corps data were adjusted <br />to conform with the frequency flood elevations published <br />by the Federal Insurance Administration." All applica' <br />tions of Corps data and other assumptions were con- <br />firmed through contact with Corps staff, <br /> <br />Average Annual Flood Damage. The methodology for <br />calculating flood damage potential to structure and con, <br />tents from the Corps data is included in Appendix B, The <br />following is the underlying conceptual basis of the <br />method empioyed, First, the expected damages asso- <br />ciated with all floods, from the 1 'year to the SOO'year or <br />greater flood, are calculated, Then the damages from <br />each are multiplied by the probability of the given flood <br />being exceeded in any given year, The probable <br />damages are then summed for all floods to obtain an <br />average annuai damage figure, <br /> <br />9 <br />