My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07468
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07468
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:51 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:00:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
The Design of Encroachments on Floodplains Using Risk Analysis
Date
10/1/1980
Prepared For
USDOT
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />6.1.3.3 Flow Resistance <br /> <br />Mannings roughness ("n") values must be determined at each cross section for <br />the flood plain and main channel. USGS Water Supply Paper 1849 has good <br />guidelines for estimating "n" values for main channels. The USGS is currently <br />conducting a study for FHWA in Louisiana to develop procedures for estimating <br />"n" values for heavily vegetated flood plains. Several hydraulic texts have <br />estimated "n" values for various crops. Some typical "n" values are tabulated <br />below. <br /> <br />Table 6.1 Typical "n" values for Flood Plains <br /> <br />Flood Plain Cover Values of n* <br /> <br />Corn <br />Small Grain <br />Pasture <br />Brush & Waste <br /> <br />.06 - .07** <br />.06 - .10 <br />.04 - .05 <br />.08 - .12 <br /> <br />* Values tabulated from Chow page 104 (23) <br />** Higher values of "n" generally relate to lower depths of flow <br /> <br />6.1.4 Geologic and Soils Data <br />6.1.4.1 Channel Morphology <br /> <br />Sequential aerial photographs should be examined to determine susceptibility <br />of the channel to lateral migration and degradation. <br /> <br />6.1.4.2 Soils Information <br /> <br />Soil samples should be obtained and analyzed for grain size distribution and <br />cohesive properties. Resistance to penetration and soil profiles should also <br />be obtained. <br /> <br />6.1.4.3 Scour History <br /> <br />Past observations of bridge scour should be used to enhance engineering <br />. judgement in making scour predictions for various bridge alternatives. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />6.1.5 Construction Costs <br /> <br />Construction cost estimates for each alternative are necessary to the LTEC <br />design process. Construction costs include initial embankment, pavement and <br />structural costs. Any maintenance costs which vary with alternatives should <br />also be included. Estimates should include allowance for varying foundation <br />depths to account for scour. Estimates should also allow for other scour <br />protection measures such as spur dikes and riprap. <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.