Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />5.0 ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />Prior to developing procedures for selecting the LTEC design, it is necessary <br />to discuss several limiting assumptions and the roles played by such key <br />variables as the service life of the structure and the discount rate used in <br />the analysis. <br /> <br />5. 1 <br /> <br />Limiting Assumptions <br /> <br />For bridge design, it is assumed in the analysis procedure that the bridge <br />itself will not fail. In other words, the foundation and other critical <br />components of the bridge are not anticipated to fail even during rare flood <br />events. The construction costs are assumed to include allowance for designing <br />against failure of these components. There may be damage to the bridge deck, <br />to embankments and to scour protection measures all of which are included in <br />the assessment of economic risks. <br /> <br />On the other hand, the assumption of failure should be included in the <br />analysis for culverts and longitudinal flood plain encroachments. This will <br />require defining failure criteria for these structures. Such criteria might <br />be linked to degree of damage, overtopping flood magnitude, or structure <br />size. Example B illustrates the analysis procedure and assumed failure <br />criteria for a culvert design. <br /> <br />Another basic assumption is that no increase in loss of life occurs. <br />Increased accident potential and damage are accounted for in the procedure. <br /> <br />The terminal or salvage value of the facility is also assumed to be zero. <br /> <br />5.2 Useful Life of Structure <br /> <br />Generally, highway properties are retired from service due to physical wear <br />and tear or deterioration, inadequacy in load capacity or traffic volume <br />capacity, general obsolescence and demand to make room for other improvements. <br />Because of the uncertainties involved, the service life of highways varies <br />over a considerable range. This variation is found not only between components <br />of the highway such as earthwork, bridges and paving but also within components. <br /> <br />Generally, highway bridges and embankment have a service life in excess of 30 <br />years. The service life of a highway pavement may be shorter. The service <br />life for culverts can be estimated by application of procedures such as <br />contained in reference 18. <br /> <br />In the LTEC design process, the construction or capital cost component <br />is amortized over the service life of the structure. This is accomplished <br />by multiplying the capital cost by the capital recovery factor, CRF. Since <br />the CRF approaches the discount rate as the service life increases, examining <br />these factors in a set of compound interest rate tables indicates that when the <br />discount rate is 7 percent or greater there is not a significant change in <br />the CRF when the service life is greater than 30 years. <br /> <br />15 <br />