Laserfiche WebLink
<br />channel area for the lOO-year flood event would be 3 to 4 feet <br />per second. Average flow velocities in the flood plain west of <br />th~ main channel, including the downtown area, would average <br />between 1 to 3 feet per second. The flood plain east of the main <br />channel would have aver~gc velocities ranging between 1 and 4 <br />feet per second. Flood flow depths would be shallow throughout <br />the reach, ranging from approximately 0.5 to 1 foot along the <br />east edge of town to a maximum depth of 4 to 4.5 feet on Clayton <br />Street. <br />Between County Road DLD and the Burlington Northern Railroad, <br />the average flow velocity for the lOO-year flood event in the main <br />channel would be approximately 2 to 3 feet per second. The fringe <br />areas of the flood plain would experience average velocities of <br />1 to 2 feet per second west of the main stream and approximately <br />0.7 to 1.2 feet per second east of the main stream. Flow depths <br />in the wide flood plain area west of the creek would average be- <br />tween 1.5 to 2 feet. <br />From County Road DLD to the upstream study limits, the main <br />channel velocities are muc h higher, r~nging from 6 to 10 feet per <br />second. Through the same reach, the overbank or fringe area velo- <br />~ities average betWeen 2.5 to 5 feet per second west of the Beaver <br />Creek main channel and 2 to 4 feet pcr second cast of Beaver Creek <br />channel. The average flow depths on the agricultural areas wLthLn <br />the flood plain on the \lest average botwocn 0.5 and 2 feet. <br />Special note should be made of the potential hazardous flood <br />velocities and depths in the downtown and residential area of the <br />City. Average velocities for the lOa-year flood event were esti- <br />mated to range between 1 to 3 feet per s~cond; however, localized <br />velocities on streets and around obstructions may be 2 or 3 times <br />the average velocity. Velocities in excess of 2 to 4 feet per <br />second and depths in excess of 2 to 3 feet can be considered as <br />hazardous to human safety and welfare. <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />Other "'loodin'! sou::-ces <br /> <br />Other sources of possible flooding in Brush include the BrUSh <br />L~teral C~nal and BaJg~r Cree~ overflows. Both of these flood <br /> <br />-ll- <br /> <br />sources were inspected and evaluated to ascertain ~n opinion on the <br />extent and possibility for diverting flood waters into the City of <br />Brush. <br />The USGS quadrangle maps show the ground topography east of <br />Badger Creek to slope towards the City of Brush, approximately 4.5 <br />miles cast. As a result, there is concern for the possibility of <br />flood waters overtopping the channel b~nks in Badger Creek at the <br />Burlington Northern railroad and State Highway 6-34 highway crossings and <br />for the flood waters to travel east to Brush. <br />Hydrologic calculations indicate the magnitude of the lOO-year <br />flood on Badger Creek to range between 25,000 cfs and 30,000 cfs. <br />Hydraulic computations shOW that the backwater effect created by <br />both the railroad and highway embankments is sufficient to overtop <br />the channel banks. However, the depth of water overtopping the <br />channel banks at either location is not sufficient to move the ex- <br />cess flood waters over the 4.5 miles of CUltivated fields and <br />irrigation later",ls "nd "mbankments and into Brush. Flooding, how- <br />ever, can be expected to occur for some distance cast of Badger <br />Creek along the railroad and high'",ay. Th" worst situation is along <br />the railroad because of the higher embankment and no provisions for <br />flows to overtop the embankment. <br />Flooding has been oxperienced in Brush due to overflows from <br />the Brush Lateral traversing through the west ~nd north portions <br />of the City. During tho 1935 flood, much water was diverted from <br />Bijou Creek into the Upper Platte and Beaver Canal and thence into <br />the Brush Lat'~ral, only to spill within the City of Brush causing <br />much damage and consternation. Since that .occurrence, an overflow <br />spillway has been constructed on the Upper Platte and Beaver Canal <br />at Badger Creek. This spillway will permit excess flood flows in <br />the canal to be spilled at a specified and safe location. <br />Storm runoff may still enter the lateral at many locations <br />within the City, resulting in possible overflow at other locations. <br />During period$ of high rainfall and runoff, the City and local <br /> <br />-12- <br />