My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07385
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:38 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:57:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
National Flood Insurance Program Administrative Procedures Manual
Date
10/1/1987
Prepared For
City, Town and County Administrators
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />..................I....._I.HI....... HB....HBII.I.I.I.IIIjI........................................................... II <br /> <br />:::;:;:;::/ ::;:;:;:;::-:.;:; :::-:.:;. ::::;';:;"-" :,:;:;::: :-::. ,:;:::;: ::::::::::: ::-":;:;:::: ::," -.;:;:::::::;:;:;::::::- .;:::;:;:; ::::::: ::;:;:;:;:;:::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:::::;:;:;::::::;:..:::-:-:....... <br />:?::.<.t <>{,:::.: ::.:{:; <::::.::;:::: :{:: ::<::tt: ::}}: ::;:./<: :::'_ "<<:::::\):-':::::-"\} ;::} <>::.((({:}::;::::::-:.:.:-....... <br />......... .... '-' . -....., ., ...-. -- . ....... <br />.. .. . ". ..,....., ., ,.... .., .. . .., <br />...... -, .. - ..... '" . .... ......"...."." ............. <br />.___ ______ - '.d __ ....... <br /> <br />Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program is one way a <br />community can protect new development from flood hazards and reduce <br />potential flood damage to existing homes and businesses. It is not, <br />however, the only way. In fact, overall reduction of flood damage is more <br />iikely if local officials combine their floodplain development regulations <br />with other activities that also reduce flood damages. This chapter briefly <br />discusses a comprehensive approach local officials can take to effec- <br />tively alleviate repetitive flood damage. <br />Floodplain management can be defined as combined actions <br />designed to reduce the damages from flood disasters. These actions <br />may modify the flood itself, reduce susceptibility to flooding, prepare for <br />an efficient response to and recovery from a flood disaster. Local <br />officials may use a combination of these strategies to provide for the <br />greatest amount of protection at the least expense. <br /> <br />A. Modifying Floods <br />Structural measures can modify floods and reduce flood damages. <br />Large dams and reservoirs can control the flow of river systems. Smaller <br />dams, dikes, floodwalls, and other structures can reduce local flooding. <br />In some cases, channels may be altered to enlarge their capacity, to <br />stabilize banks and prevent erosion, and to clear away vegetation, rocks, <br />or other features that obstruct the flow of fioodwaters. Diversions and <br />spillways employing natural or constructed channels can be installed to <br />divert flood flows from developed areas. <br />Land-treatment measures help increase absorption of rainfall into the <br />soil and decrease runoff rates, which can result in reduced flood peaks. <br />Such techniques include planting and maintaining vegetation to act as <br />runoff interceptors and diversions, small detention and erosion control <br />structures, and terraces. Detention measures, such as landscaped or <br />paved holding areas, can be built into development sites to lower the <br />runoff rate of rainfall and thereby reduce the flood peaks of collecting <br />streams. <br />While structural measures are often a popular answer to flooding <br />problems, reliance on structures as the oniy solution to these problems <br />has several disadvantages. Some of these are listed below. <br />- Structural measures are generally expensive, which can make such <br />solutions economically infeasible. <br />- In many cases, structures encourage investment and development <br />in flood-prone areas, thereby exposing more properties to the flood <br />hazard. <br />- Structures do not provide absolute protection. They offer a false <br />sense of security. If a disaster does exceed the design for a struc- <br />ture, damages are far greater than they may have been if fear of <br />flooding had discourage development. <br />- Gains in one area, such as protection for urban areas, may be <br />offset by losses in other areas, such as inundation of agricultural or <br />unique recreational areas. In other words, the structural measure <br />Simply relocates the flood rather than reducing the hazard. <br />- Structural techniques used alone often must be larger and exert a <br />greater degree of man-made influence over the watercourse and <br />other resources than would be necessary if land-use controls were <br />used to direct future development away from flood-prone areas. <br /> <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.