Laserfiche WebLink
<br />hydraulic analyses and delineate new floodplain boundaries and <br />flood ways as necessary, In addition, new flooding information can- <br />not be added to a NFIP map in such a way as to create mis- <br />matches with the flooding information shown for unrevised areas, <br />Therefore, in performing new analyses and developing revised <br />flooding information, the requestor must tie his new flood <br />elevations, floodplain boundaries, and floodways into those shown <br />for areas not affected by the revisions, When requests involve new <br />flood discharge values, extensive changes in hydraulic conditions, <br />or complex situations in which changes made to the flooding infor- <br />mation developed for one flooding source will affect that <br />developed for others, the requestor may be required to provide <br />new information for a large portion of the map" <br />. All analyses and data submitted by the requestor must be certified <br />by a registered professional engineer or licensed land surveyor, as <br />appropriate, <br />. Revisions cannot be made based on the effects of proposed proj- <br />ects or future conditions; therefore, unless a conditional revision is <br />requested, any maps, plans, drawings, measurements, or elevation <br />data submitted by the appellant must be certified "as-built" or as <br />representing existing conditions, additionally, FEMA will not make <br />revisions to phases of a project. Revisions are made only when the <br />whole projects is complete,; <br />. NFIP maps may be revised when flood discharges change as a <br />result of structural improvements, such as dams or other signifi' <br />cant retention facilities, However, NFIP maps will not be revised <br />when discharges change as a result of the use of an alternative <br />methodology or better data unless the change is statistically <br />significant. The criteria to be used in determining whether a <br />change is statistically significant are discussed in Section 2-6, <br />"Hydrologic Analyses," of the FEMA Guidelines and Specifica- <br />tions for Study Contractors (dated September 1985), Therefore, <br />when requesting a revision based on new flood discharges, the <br />requestor should determine the significance of the change before <br />proceeding with new hydraulic analyses, When the statistical <br />significance test does not apply, a determination by a Federal or <br />State agency that the change is significant may be accepted as <br />the basis for revision, <br />. When a requestor is required to submit a hydraulic analysis for <br />flooding sources originally studied by detailed methods, the <br />analysis must be performed for the 10" 50" 100-, and 500'year <br />floods and floodway, Unless the basis of the request is the use of <br />an alternative hydraulic methodology, the analysis should be made <br />using the same hydraulic computer model used to deveiop the <br />BFE's shown on the effective NFIP map, You may request, through <br />the appropriate FEMA Regional Office, a copy of the input and <br />output data from the originai computer model. Any differences be' <br />tween the original and revised models must be justified on the <br />basis of physical changes that have occurred, better hydraulic <br />data, or revised discharges, The revised model should also include <br />all existing conditions, including any encroachments that have <br />occurred in the floodplain since the original model was developed, <br />When the new hydraulic analysis is submitted to FEMA, copies of <br />the input and output data from the original and revised computer <br />models should be submitted, <br />. For information concerning additional data that must be submitted <br />to support requests that involve changes to floodways refer to <br />FEMA pOlicy concerning floodway revisions in Section I, <br />Amendments of this document. <br />. When a requestor is required to submit a hydrologic or hydraulic <br />analysis for a flooding source originally studied by approximate <br />methods, the analysis may be performed for only the 100-year <br />flood, <br />. When requesting a revision of fioodplain delineations based on <br />significant topographiC changes, the requestor must verify that the <br />new topographiC data do not significantly alter the hydraulic <br />characteristics of the stream; if they do, a new hydraulic analysis <br />may be necessary, <br />. When a requestor is required to submit delineations of floodplain <br />boundaries for a flooding source originally studied by detailed <br />methods, both the 100-, and 500'year floodplain boundaries must <br /> <br />27 <br />