My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07354
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07354
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:33 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:55:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Platte Center Nebraska
Basin
Statewide
Title
Flood Hazard Mitigation Study for Platte Center, Nebraska
Date
8/1/1991
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers
Prepared By
Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'. <br /> <br />BRIDGE ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The three bridges within the Elm Creek study reach were field <br />surveyed by the Nebraska NRC, In each case, bridge losses in the <br />hydraulic model at all three bridges were determined using the HEC-2 <br />Normal Bridge Method, <br /> <br />HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The hydraulic model was developed based on the known high-water <br /> <br /> <br />marks and flood boundary from the June 1990 flood, Using the range of <br /> <br /> <br />Corps-predicted discharges, Manning's On" values ,tanged from 0.042 to <br /> <br /> <br />0.060 with an average of 0,044 in the c)lannel and':from 0,033 to 0.15, <br /> <br /> <br />with an average of 0,07 . along the overbanks, Full valley cross <br /> <br /> <br />sections were used with the excepcion of cross seccions 3400 through <br /> <br /> <br />5150. At these seccions, enc~oachments were established on the right <br /> <br /> <br />bank along the cencerline of t~e main UPRR track. See appendix A for <br /> <br /> <br />cross section locations, Because the lst Street bridge was replaced <br /> <br /> <br />as a result of the flood, the surveyed elevation of the bridge deck <br /> <br /> <br />was slightly higher than the original bridge. Based on information <br /> <br /> <br />provided by the Platte County superintendent, the deck elevation in <br /> <br /> <br />the hydraulic model was lowered 2 inches t~ r~flect 1990 condLtions, <br /> <br />0' <br /> <br />Yith this hydraulic model, a discharge of approximately 13,200 <br /> <br /> <br />cubic feet per second (c. f. s.) "as required to meet the high-water <br /> <br /> <br />marks, the 50-year frequency based on discharge estimates developed in <br /> <br /> <br />this study. Figure 2 shows a comparison of the water surface profile <br /> <br /> <br />developed with this hydraulic model and the high-water marks. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br />To determine the accuracy of the hydraulic model, the flood <br /> <br /> <br />boundary was p10cced based on che elevations projected at each cross <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.