Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />;. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- --- <br /> <br />Hydraulics <br /> <br />Hydraulic Analyses were completed for both the eXlstmg channel conditions and for proposed <br />improvements. The most recent version (4.6.2: May ]991) of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' <br />HEC-2 computer program was used to determine water surface profiles for the 10-year. 50-year, and <br />1 DO-year flood events. The model used for this study was the same model developed by the SCS as <br />presented in their April 1992 Report. For existing channel. conditions, L:uS model was duplicated and <br />the resulting water surface profiles matches those presented by the SCS. For proposed improvements, <br />some cross-sections and split flow areas were modified in order to accurately depict proposed bridge, <br />channel. and levee improvements. A more detailed discussion of these modifications is included in the <br />Project Formulation Section of this report. <br /> <br />Comparisons of the 100-year water surface elevations were made for existing and proposed conditions <br />in order to evaluate potential impacts of the proposed improvements. Table 8 presents a summary of <br />the 10-year. 50-year, and 1 DO-year flood events for proposed and existing conditions. As shown in the <br />table, flood elevations for the lOO-year event west of CR. 35 to just downstream of CR. 3 1 increase for <br />the proposed improvements. This can be expected since the proposed leve,es along the north overbank <br />of Pa"'l1ee Creek confine the flows to the main channel and increase the discharges through this reach. <br />Map Sheet 1 presents the existing floodplain along Pawnee Creek as presented in the SCS April 1992 <br />Report. Also shown are the proposed improvements and resulting residual 1 DO-year floodplain. Flood <br />profiles depicting the existing and proposed 1 DO-year water surface elevations are presented on Figures <br />8 and 9. A detailed description of the proposed improvements is included in the following section of <br />this report. <br /> <br />Proiect Formulation <br /> <br />Based on an evaluation of existing studies and input from the project sponsors, it was determined that a <br />system of levees and channel improvements in combination with widening the existing bridges at <br />HWY 6 and the UPRR is the most economical approach to solving the Pawnee Creek Overflow <br />problems. Development of the Pawnee Creek improvements began with modifications to the existing <br />HEC-2 model to analyze the impacts of proposed levees, bridge, and channel improvements. The <br />following describes the modifications made to the existing HEC-2 model: <br /> <br />1. No changes were made to the existing model from the study limits upstream of CR. 3 I (cross- <br />section 3839) to just downstream of CR. 3 1 (cross-section 30.1) since no improvements are <br />proposed in this reach. <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />The model was revised to eliminate the existing flow splits in the north overbank. downstream of <br />CR. 33 at cross-section 2728. This was accomplished by adding the flows which split out of <br />Pawnee Creek towards the City of Sterling back into the model starting at cross-section 26 and <br />continuing to cross-section 21. The discharges were also increased upstream of HWY 6 to account <br />for the flow splits draining from the Town of Atwood and to eliminate the existing flows which <br />currently drain past the bridges at HWY 6 and on towards the City of Sterling. The amount of <br />storrn water draining from the Town of Atwood to Pawnee Creek on the northwest side of HWY 6 <br />was determined by the Colorado Water Conservation Board based on field surveys and utilizing a <br />weir flow equation. <br /> <br />27 <br />