Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Proposed Improvements: Based on discussions 'With the City, CWCB, and CDOT, A combination of <br />alternatives 1 and 2 was selected as the recommended approach to improving the crossings at H\VY 6, <br />Sheet I of 4 presents the proposed improvement for Pawnee Creek, Tne proposed improvements for <br />Pa'Wnee Creek include two levees downstream of the lJ1'RR ranging in height from I foot to 5,5 feeL <br />Tnese levees are shown on Map Sheet 1 and lA and are labeled Levee Nwnber 1 l-.ior..h and Levee <br />Nwnber 1 South, The north levee will extenc east from about 300 fee: downstream of the railroad to <br />the defmed low flow channel of Pawnee C:eek and then curve north and follow the channd to an <br />existing dir: road just west of the limits of the 100-year fle,odplain of the South Platte River, This <br />levee will be approximately 1,400 feet in length, A 300 foot long floodwall "ill be required <br />immediately east of the railroad bridge on the north side of the channel where right,of,way is limited <br />by an existing residence and livestock pen. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />The south levee will extend east from proposed channel irnprove:7lents downstream of the UPRR for <br />about 1,500 feet to a dirt road just east of the limits of the 100,year floodplain of the South Plane <br />River. The south levee will prohibit low flows from draining along their existing course around a <br />4.400 feet long oxbow formed bv the existing channel; therefore, a new low flow char~el must be <br />, -- . - <br />constructed to convey storm water between stations 16.,..00 and 72e-OO, 'This channel wil] be <br />trapezoidal in shape utilizing a 30 foot bonom width and 3: I sideslopes, The depth of the low flow <br />channel will range from 2 feet at the point where it leaves the existing channel oxbow to about 9 feet <br />where it must daylight back into Pawnee Creek, <br /> <br />Channel improvements are also proposed from a point 100 :eet upstream Df H\VY 6 to approximately <br />200 iee: do'Wnstream of the UPRR, Tne highway bridges will need to be improved to accommodate <br />the increase in discharges due to the confinement of the split flows by the proposed upstream levees, <br />As discussed earlier. the existing bridge for the northbound traffic is a wooden structure and CDOT <br />plans to replace this bridge in the next 3 to 5 years, For the southbound lanes, 4 cells of 20' x 8' RCB <br />would be installed JUSt south of the existing bridge, The culverts could be pre,cast which would <br />minimize [he time required to complete the installation, thus limiting the impacts to existing traffic, <br />Wing walls upstream and downstream, as well as :iprap protection would be ~equired, Conceptual <br />cross,sections of the channel and bridge improvements at HVv'Y 6 and the CPRR are presented m <br />Figures 10 and j 1, In order to construct the new box culverts south of the existing bridge, the existmg <br />siphon along the Springdaie Ditch which carries irrigation water under the railroad and highway may <br />need to be extended to the south. There is also an existing concrete ditch diversion structure located <br />just dov.nstream of the DPRR which wi]) have to be removed, Tnis strucnlIe is prese;]tl)' abandoned <br />and preliminarv discussions with the o'Wners indicated that they are agreeable to its removable, <br /> <br />~.J <br />