FLOOD07329 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MEMORANDUM Itar 1 Mohr, PEMA June 29, 1984 Page 5 "nn;.s. #4'41 Pt,l,lZNClt$- tv~ C;t:" .:fI.I~4' 41, /'PBr The community submitted detailed tdpographic information in support of changing the elevation and delineations of flooding designated as Zone AS. You told us to make the revision. t. Ouray and Ouray COunty, COlorado (Part 67) - Bill informed us that Region 8 wants' to hold a final lIleeting for the city and county before the end of July. Therefore, we should advance, if possible, the JUly 20 scheduled Preliminary distribution date, Bill agreed that sending the studies directly to the communities rather than through Region 8 would be one option to accelerate the process. Be asked us to coor- dinate with Virginia Motoyama. ('I u. Poca te 110 , Idaho (Part 65) - We discussed with Bill a letter dated April 4, 1984, from the city requesting a FIRM revision to incorporate the effects of a new levee in the Gibson Jack Creek area. He told us to prepare a duta request letter. v. Porterville, Cdlfornia (Part 65) - Phil returned our letter responding to the communit~'s review comments on the Preliminary Revised FIRM. He said that yc'u believed we were requesting too IllUch information. We are to review the areas the city wants changed. and if the flood plain width is less than 200 feet. remove flooding from the PIRM. If the drainage area for the flooding is less than 1 square mile, the zone designation should be changed to B. f',--' I'i\ '. '.' w. Prescott, Arizona (Part 70) - We informed Phil that based on detailed topographic in~Jrmation submitted by Mr. Bagnall in support of his LOMA request. h:Ls structure is out of the SPBA because the 100-year flood boundary :Ls incorrectly plotted. However. the flood boundary is coincident w;Lth the floodway boundary at his property, therefore, under normal cil~culllStances, a floodway boundary revision would be required before a LC)!A could be issued. However, in this case, making the resulting fl.ood and floodway boundary and floodway change would be within the te:,lerance limits of the map scale. Pbil told us to grant the LaMA and prepare a letter to the CEO requesting additional topographic information to change the flood and floodway boundaries. x. Ranqely, COlorad!? (Part 67) - We discussed lIlOdeling prOblems caused by the SC's lack of below-water sections. You instructed us to prepare a letter to the SC\for Bill Judkins' signature aSking for, adequate documen'~ation of tl1eir methodology and informing them that. ' its future use wHl require written authorization from PBMA.