My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07316
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:26 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:52:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Community Block Grant Applications Review 1984
Date
3/19/1984
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />APPLICATION NO.: 85-603 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: Town of Del Norte <br /> <br />a. Local Financial <br />COII1Ditments <br /> <br />L I M I H I I <br />X I I I I <br />(Local contribution per capita: $2.) I <br />Town is providing $3,500 match; $1,500 engineer.; $2,000 I <br />for construction. Adminis. (other than engineer. & I <br />audit) provided by in-kind services of town manager and I <br />clerk. I <br />I <br /> <br />2. PUBLI~/PRIVATE <br />COMMITMENTS <br /> <br />b. Local Non-Financial <br />CO/llllitments <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />c. Other CO/llllitments <br /> <br />3. MANAGEMENT <br />CAPABILITY <br /> <br />L M H <br />X <br /> <br />a. Staff and <br />Contractors <br /> <br />Town manager to be project manager; consulting engineer <br />to be project coordinator; town clerk to be fiscal <br />admi ni strator. <br /> <br />b. Budget <br /> <br />Engineer design 8.6%; construction inspection 4%. <br />Remaining administrative budget provided by salaried <br />town manager and clerk. <br /> <br />c. Statutory/Regula- <br />tory Comp 1i ance <br /> <br />Significant problems developed in carrying out a 1983 <br />CDBG project. (See Con Statement below.) <br /> <br />PRO STATEMENTS: <br /> <br />o A-1 category of "State Water Needs List." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CON STATEMENTS: <br /> <br />o Low local match. <br /> <br />o The Town experienced significant administrative problems in carrying out a <br />$382,000 CDBG project funded in 1983. At the end of a 17-month contract, only 4 <br />of the proposed 26 homes were rehabilitated (about $59,000 of budgeted $233,000 <br />was actually expended) and little progress had been made in undertaking a <br />drainage project (for which $89,000 in CDBG funds had been budgeted). During <br />the contracted period the Town expended about $54,000 (of $60,000 budgeted) for <br />administration. About $1,500 of the actual administrative costs have been <br />disallowed. Have these administrative problems been rectified? <br /> <br />o Since the water quality problems were identified in September, 1984, why did the <br />Town not address this need with more local dollars during their budget cycle? <br /> <br />COMMENTS: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />o Local Priority: 1 of 1. <br />o Eligibility of activities: Eligible. <br />o Validity of National Objectives: See <br /> <br />below. <br /> <br />o Water user fees at $7.33/month; proposed to' be increased to $8.00/month in July, <br />1985. <br /> <br />o CWCB requests more information regarding the location of the water filtration <br />plant in relation to the flood plain. <br /> <br />o Has the Town made a specific designation of community-wide blight due to the <br />unsafe water system? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.