Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1.2 Proposed Study Effort <br /> <br />1.2.1 GENERAL STUDY SCOPE <br />The study effort will build upon what was learned in the Reconnaissance Study (905 (b) <br />Report), The primary study objective is to determine the most beneficial plan to reduce <br />the flood threat to Greeley and improve the riparian ecosystem of the Cache la Poudre <br />River. Based upon the results of the Reconnaissance Study, is anticipated that flood <br />damages can be reduced by increasing stream channel conveyance, lowering flood peaks <br />by storing part of the excess flow in designated areas of the flood plain and removing <br />some property from the floodway, <br /> <br />Channel conveyance can be improved by buying and removing some property from <br />critical reaches of the floodway and moving existing sand berms further from the center <br />ofthe river. Widening the floodway will build upon the City's on-going effort to <br />improve the channel capacity of bridge crossings in Greeley, Where the floodway can be <br />widened, efforts will be made to improve both the environment in the reach and provide a <br />public access corridor. <br /> <br />Gravel pits and old oxbows offer potential as storage areas for flood flows, In addition, <br />unoccupied flood plain property, such as the old sugar plant reservoir site east of 6th <br />Avenue near the mouth of Eaton Draw, could also be used for flood storage, The flood <br />storage areas will also be evaluated for their potential to improve riparian habitat along <br />the Cache la Poudre River in Greeley, wetland habitat for migratory bird species and for <br />public access via the regional trail system, <br /> <br /> <br />The initial focus ofthe study will be to identify flood reduction alternatives that are likely <br />to have favorable benefit / cost ratios, Additionally, ecosystem restoration efforts that are <br />the most productive will be identified at that time. For both the flood damage reduction <br />and ecosystem improvement efforts, typical tasks will include defining the problem and <br />opportunities, forecasting the future conditions without a project and formulating <br />alternative plans. This initial focus is referred to as "Decision Point 1" and an <br />incremental cost estimate has been prepared for that part of the study. <br /> <br />Specific tasks that will be addressed for Decision Point 1 include defining of stage, <br />frequency,damage curves along key river reaches, determining the shape of major <br />historical flood hydrographs, trends in flooding with time and identifying specific <br />channel reaches and storage areas for ecosystem restoration, An economic analysis will <br />be conducted, including the existing condition expected annual damages for floods of all <br />frequencies, The existing ecosystem w\ll be documented, and a dominant coveHype <br />map developed for the project reach, <br /> <br />If desirable flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration measures are identified for <br />Decision Point I, then the study will continue to its conclusion through the process of <br />evaluating the alternatives against the "without project" alternative, comparing the <br />alternatives and selecting a plan, When Decision Point I is reached, the scope of the <br /> <br />6 <br />