Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />i. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />!. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Bosley Wash Drainage Master Plan Phase I: Watershed Floodplain Delineation <br />__ .'~ II JIll<~~,i""""4ifJ -~;>;-3'C4J'iW"""~4!"'~';""'" ,','I:'" ,. <br />~'1'mi __ \>Ie ~~~"",",,"~:";":~Z~~,I,!..,;;V;~,:+-i,,'" 1..-' <br /> <br /> <br />5.2.2 Cross-Section Processing <br /> <br />Hydraulic cross-sections were developed using a combination of the field survey and the GIS <br /> <br /> <br />mapping, Overbank areas of each cross-section were obtained from the 2 foot contour mapping <br /> <br />included within the GIS coverages provided by the County, The main channel for all reaches <br /> <br />was determined using points from the field survey combined with field observations, <br /> <br />5.2.3 Hydraulic Control <br /> <br />The downstream control used for all flood evaluations in the hydraulic model was the FEMA <br /> <br />lOO'year water surface elevation for the Colorado River. Other intermediate control sections <br /> <br />were derived from the backwater profile of the Bosley Wash main stem, <br /> <br />5.2.4 Highline Canal Siphon Crossing <br /> <br />The Government Highline Canal presented a unique condition, HDR was directed to assume <br /> <br /> <br />that no flow would be intercepted by the canal. While some anecdotal evidence suggests this <br /> <br />may not always be the case, any possible weir flow over the canal is assumed to be negligible <br /> <br />relative to flows through the culvert, It was assumed that there is sufficient available storage <br /> <br />behind the Government Highline Canal to prevent weir flow, A further assumption is that all <br /> <br /> <br />flow stored behind the siphon was metered out through the siphon over time and that no flow <br /> <br />would extend west past 34 Road, <br /> <br />The siphon through the Government Highline Canal was modeled as a culvert, A rating curve <br /> <br />was developed for this structure and a stage-storage-discharge relationship was input into HMS, <br /> <br />The peak flow from the model was input into the HEC-RAS, <br /> <br />5.2,5 Stub Ditch <br /> <br />The Stub Ditch flows were limited by the calculated capacity. These calculated capacities were <br /> <br />used in the development of the HMS model. While this reduced the computed discharges, the <br /> <br />Stub Ditch still overtops along much of its route during large events, The computed flows that <br /> <br />remain in the ditch were used in the hydraulic model. <br /> <br />~~1t41~~1~:;~;;i:';;,-,."-~ <br />~ /---" <br />~ ~ <br /> <br />lil"1 <br /> <br />Qt''''"'''''. <br />" . ...,,~ <br />'ff ..~' <br />'''$O'::~J?-~'\~~/' <br /> <br />Page 20 <br />