My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07275
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07275
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:19 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:50:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Costilla
Community
Costilla County
Stream Name
Trinchera Creek, Costilla Creek
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
Floodplain Information Report
Date
3/1/1994
Prepared For
Costilla County
Prepared By
CWCB
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,,^'- <br />,~ - <br />r' ~ <br />~ 0( <br />/)",( \ <br />~ <br />'\ <br />L <br />r~ <br />i <br />i <br />L <br /> <br />""'v. <br />" <br />MOUNTAIt-..i <br />;';Ol"'lE <br />R ES~\<.\lO lR <br /> <br /> <br />5 \.-.' <br />1'-"" <br /> <br />RE:SEP'\I'IR <br /> <br />"'.,... <br />_0 <br /> <br />--, <br /> <br />_h. <br /> <br /><; Uk. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />...t'" <br />".." '" ~Y' <br />~ \ ",V <br />STAStU1A":""IUJ.,",1 <br />RESER.VOIR ~I <br />1ft <br />)1 <br />J) SF1N: H~2. <br />i::.i'.STDAL.E ~.// P..ESfR,\)D: <br />~.=S~RVC0o'" <br />\ NO..1 <br />'\.~ <br /> <br />"u '" <br /> <br />c' <br />., <br />~~ <br />o <br /> <br />,'igure 4, Map of e1ajor Reservoirs <br /> <br />-25- <br /> <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />o <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />'. <br />o <br />'. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />V,.I\u..CvJ <br />Cp.c~k: <br />RSSER\'0IR <br /> <br />"'~~h <br /> <br />- <br />o <br />'- <br /> <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />3.6 Peak Flows <br /> <br />i; <br /> <br />The final task remainin':l in the hydrologic analysis was to <br />consider all of the factors discussed above and synthesize them. <br />A discharge profile for each of the three major tributaries, from <br />th., furthest r,jdge upstream all the way to the confluence with the <br />Rio Grande. was needed. Because Of the pattern of stream gages in <br />the county. the most difficult part Of this task. was the <br />determination of flows from the middle of the county west <br />(downstream) to the Rio Grande. For a very short time (less than <br />one year) there were stream gages at the mouth of each Of the <br />three major tributary streams. These gages were not maintained <br />long enough to provide meaningful data. The gages that do provide <br />such long, term data are mostly clustered in and near the Sangre <br />de Cristo foothills. <br /> <br />N <br /> <br />Determining discharge prOfiles was difficult for other reasons <br />as well. Downstream Of foothills locations like f'ort Garland, San <br />Luis. and Garcia average fLows are significantly reduced. Factors <br />contributing to these reductions in average annual flows as one <br />travels from east to west are valley storaqe. greater losses due <br />to infiltration into sandier soils. reservoir storage. irrigation <br />diversions from streams that are some of the most overappropriated <br />in Colorado, inadvertent detention by highways. roads, and <br />agricultural activity, and significantly reduced precipitation. <br />The area around Alamosa, the eastern part of Conejos County. and <br />the western part of Costilla County has the lowest average annual <br />precipitation of any area in Colorado accordinq to the National <br />Weather Service. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />\ <br />, <br />t <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />As a result of these factors. the flOOdplains in the <br />downstream portion Of each of the three major basins are not as <br />obvious in the field as the floodplains farther upstream. A <br />detailed calculation Of that part of each stream's discharge <br />profile would require reviewing reservoir records and irrigation <br />records and performing hydrologic routings to determine losses due <br />to valley storage and inadvertent detention by highways, roads, <br />agricultural features and so on. Such an analysis was beyond the <br />scope of this study. For that reason, it was decided that the <br />peak flow determined at the qage that was the farthest downstream <br />on each of the three major streams should be used from the <br />location Of that gage downstream to the stream's confluence with <br />the Rio r.rande. In view of the above discussion about flow <br />dttenuation. that is a vllry conservative assumption. <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />The and lysis conducted for TM-l and for the SCS study of Rito <br />Seco were borh plotted on one graph, showing drainaqe area on the <br />independent axis and the ratio of the calCUlated peak 100-y~ar <br />flow to drainage area (cubic feet per 6econd per ~quare mile) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />_26_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.