My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07249
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07249
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:15 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:50:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Aurora, Grand Junction, Durango, Canon City
Basin
Statewide
Title
Participant Notebook, Flood Mazard Mitigatin Planning: A Workshop for Colorado Local Governments
Date
9/28/2000
Prepared For
CWCB / DNR / CASFM
Prepared By
The Mitigation Assistance Corporation
Floodplain - Doc Type
Education Material
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Zone A, base floodplain <br />RL - Re titive loss area <br /> <br />Trib, A - Tributary A to Crows Branch <br />WWTP - Wastewater treatment Ian <br /> <br />Large-scale, community-wide maps and general information are usually sufficient for a community <br />mitigation plan, Estimates may be sufficient for larger communities that may find it difficult and <br />e time consuming to locate every floodprone building, <br /> <br />However, if time and resources permit, you should consider collecting data on each lot to <br />determine appropriate property protection measures, This information is particularly valuable if a <br />large acquisition or structural flood control project has been judged not feasible. The property <br />protection scoring system in Section 5 of this notebook has details on information to collect when <br />planning on a building-by-building basis. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Other problems <br /> <br />Flooding impacts more than buildings, The problem assessment should review the following <br />items, too: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />roads, bridges, and transportation facilities closed during a flood <br />critical facilities affected (e,g" hospitals damaged or isolated) <br />areas of repetitive flooding <br />flood protection measures in effect or under <br />construction <br />what happened in past floods <br />undeveloped areas and wetlands which provide <br />natural and beneficial functions <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Your written problem statement may devote just <br />as much space to each of the other concerns as it <br />does to flooding, To be effective in the long run, <br />the plan should be a true multi-objective <br />approach. You may have to suppress your desire <br />to make flooding the onlv concern. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The "10-Step" Mitigation Planning Process <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />May 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.