My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07246
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07246
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:15 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:50:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Community
Buffalo Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Wildfire Flood-Hazard and Watershed-Rehabilitation Monitoring
Date
1/8/1998
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />in burned areas. Add~ional research objectives are to: 1.) determine the length of time for the basin to <br />return to pre-fire conditions; 2.) assess the effectiveness of watershed-management practices used to <br /> <br /> <br />mitigate water and sediment runoff; 3.) compile merature on wildfire-hazard mitigation; and 4.) develop a <br /> <br /> <br />paleoflood-based monitoring program that provides data needed for subsequent ecological and forest <br /> <br /> <br />rehabilitation activ~ies. Limited resources preclude extensive, instrumented data-collection efforts, and <br /> <br /> <br />there also is a likelihood floods may not occur in instrumented basins. Data mon~oring needs to begin <br /> <br /> <br />immediately after a wildfire because important data are lost shortly after each storm and hazard-m~igation <br /> <br /> <br />efforts. Monitoring in burned and unburned areas consists of determining rainfall amounts, peak flows, <br /> <br /> <br />and channel agradation and degradation. <br /> <br />The study approach was applied to the community of Buffalo Creek, located about 50 km southwest of <br /> <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado (fig. 1). On May 18, 1996, an intense wildfire, now known as the Buffalo Creek wildfire, <br /> <br /> <br />burned about 50 km2 of forest. Following the fire, rainstorms produced nine, 1 OO-year or larger flash <br /> <br /> <br />floods (pre-fire cond~ions). Two people were killed and several million dollars in public and private <br /> <br /> <br />property damage occurred for the largest flood on July 12, 1997. Additionally, xx million dollars were <br /> <br /> <br />spent fighting the fire and on watershed-rehabil~ation efforts. Colorado is the first state in the Nation to <br /> <br /> <br />create a statewide fire assessment map, which outlines areas most vulnerable to catastrophic wildfires <br /> <br /> <br />(USFS, written commun., 1997). Buffalo Creek is located in a moderate fire-hazard area, thus, illustrating <br /> <br /> <br />the potential hazards in other wildland-urban interface areas. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Wildfires, which change flood and sediment production, are a natural process cr~icalto maintaining hea~hy <br /> <br /> <br />ecosystems and have occurred numerous times in the western Un~ed States during about the last 8,000 <br /> <br /> <br />years (Weise and Martin, 1995; Meyer et aI., 1995). In 1997, wildfires burned more than 25,000 km2 in the <br /> <br /> <br />western United States, which was the most area since 1952 (National Interagency Fire Center, written <br /> <br /> <br />commun., 1997). Substantial resources are directed towards mitigation of water and sediment runoff in <br /> <br /> <br />burned areas, however, little is known about the effectiveness of watershed-rehabil~ation practices. Most <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.