Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Diversion Characters: <br /> <br />7. Previous Studies: <br /> <br />./ <br />,/ <br /> <br />1/ <br /> <br />,/ <br /> <br />does affect hydrology <br />does not affect hydrology <br />should not use stream data records <br />from to <br /> <br />existing <br />title <br />ti tIe <br />ti tle <br /> <br />information <br /> <br />r~ r- <br />PI', i/O,'" <br /> <br />new conditions <br />new methodologies <br />comparison provided <br />compatible with previous flows <br />significantly different statistically <br />confidence limits <br />90X confidence interval <br />SOX confidence interval <br /> <br />FINOING: <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis ~ meets_____ <br />standards of ~ Rule 5.B. (detailed) or <br /> <br />does not meet the mlnlmum <br />Rule 6.B. (approx.) <br /> <br />e c. Hydraulic Analysis <br /> 1. Water Surface <br /> Profiles included: J lo-year <br /> ./ 50-year <br /> ,/ lOo-year <br /> J 500-year (optional) <br /> frequency-elevation table <br /> 2, Floodplain J lOO-year <br /> Boundaries: ./ 50o-year (optional) <br /> 3. Methodology: a. J step backwater method <br /> ,/ HEC-2 <br /> other . <br /> b. alternative method <br /> published manual <br /> assumed depth method <br /> depth stated on maps <br /> geomorphic features methoJ. <br /> history flood method <br /> rating curve method <br /> 4. Delineation I flood contour method etc. <br /> Procedures: map contour method etc. <br />e <br /> -8- <br />