My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07170
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07170
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:02 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:47:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
El Paso
Community
Manitou Springs
Stream Name
Fountain Creek
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Hydrology for FEMA, Phase II
Date
2/1/1994
Prepared For
FEMA
Prepared By
RCE
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />1.1. Evaluation Procedure <br /> <br />The first step in the evaluation of hydrology for FEMA Flood Studies was to obtain all available <br />existing data for the stream basins in question, These included previous Flood Insurance Studies <br />(FIS), Master Drainage Reports (MDR), Letter of Map Revisions (LOMR), Letter of Map Amendments <br />(LOMA), Colorado State Highway Department culvert design analyses, and other related reports, <br /> <br />These documents were reviewed on a stream-by-stream basis to determine the current <br />applicability of the hydrology presented in each, The pertinent criteria included the existing level of <br />development in each basin, hydrologic modeling parameters and procedures utilized, and major <br />discrepancies among different reports for the same basin, <br /> <br />Field reconnaissance was conducted on all the study stream reaches to verify existing <br /> <br /> <br />conditions, Where necessary, return field investigations were undertaken to satisfy specific questions <br /> <br /> <br />arising from the literature review, Locations of the stream reaches being studied are shown in Figure <br /> <br /> <br />1,1, <br /> <br />In the cases where the reported hydrology was determined reasonable (according to FEMA <br />study guidelines), a modeling check of the parameters used was made to verify the resultant <br />discharges, For those cases with differing levels of development from existing conditions and/or out <br />of date design storm criteria, modifications were made to the parameters and a revised modeling <br />analysis was conducted, <br /> <br /> <br />The most detailed evaluations were made for the streams that exhibited major discharge <br />discrepancies among different reports, There were also cases where the City of Colorado Springs or <br />EI Paso County questioned the validity of reported discharges, Under these conditions, a detailed <br />hydrology reanalysis was undertaken, This included complete reevaluation of subbasin boundaries <br />and areas, Time of Concentration (T c) estimates, soil curve numbers, streamflow routing, and <br />detention storage routing, <br /> <br />1,1 Resource Consultants & Engineers, I nc, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.