Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Problem Area is also aggrading, as indicated by the PZF plot of the Arkansas River at <br />Las Animas showing aggradation for the period afterl974 (see Figure 6). The effective average <br />channel width is approximately 150 feet. <br /> <br />The channel improvement template for this problem area uses a 70-foot bottom width for <br />the low-flow channel, with a slight meander that results in a channel slope of 0.00111. The 2,500 <br />cfs channel has a 200-foot bottom width and follows the valley slope, estimated to be <br />approximately 0.00113. . <br /> <br />3.2.6 Hydraulic and Sediment Summary <br /> <br />The hydraulic and sediment analyses performed indicate several things. First, the <br />maximum conveyance capacity within the channel is approximately 1,000 cfs. Second, the <br />erratic hydraulics likely cause seepage problems fro#llocalized high stages in other areas. Third, <br />the channel form and profile are widely variable and :these in tum cause a broad range of <br />sediment transport potentials within the individual reaches. The "fits and starts" nature of the <br />areas inhibits effective conveyance of water and sediment. The sediment transport potentials <br />along the river area are erratic. <br /> <br />The channel appears to be largely impacted by these phenomena: hydrologic changes <br />due to flow regulation and urbanization upstream, changes in the vegetal makeup of the <br />floodplain, agricultural encroachment, and the backwater affect of John Martin Reservoir. The <br />dominant discharge appears to have undergone dramatic changes. Vegetation moves into the <br />newly formed banks and inhibits widening again during high flows. Likewise agriculture moves <br />closer in and functions in essentially the same manner. Reduced peaks induce the sense that the <br />river needs less room. In much the same way this encroachment inhibits rewidening of the <br />channel. The battles are fought, sometimes at considerable cost, and the river responds with <br />further instability. The cycle continues and the effective capacity becomes less and less. <br />Compounding this, the available energy slope decre\lses as the reservoir is neared. <br /> <br />3.3 ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Historic and current ecological conditions were determined from scientific literature, <br />govemment reports, consultation with private individuals and agency representatives, and site <br />visits. <br /> <br />Otero and Bent Counties lie within the Southwestern Tablelands ecoregion which is <br />transitional between the Southern Rocky Mountain \lnd Western High Plains ecoregions (Bailey <br />1976). The native plant community outside the Ar~ansas River floodplain is comprised of short <br />grass prairie. Common species include blue grama" side-oats grama, buffalo grass, galleta, alkali <br />sacaton, sand dropseed, western wheatgrass, and three-awn. Throughout the Arkansas River <br />valley, irrigated agricultural cropland that includes most of the floodplain and upland areas that <br />are now below irrigation canals predominates and often directly abuts the river channel. There <br />are a few small areas of irrigated pasture, dry cropllind, or rangeland. <br /> <br />38 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />