Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />.1 <br /> <br />After further discussion with the experts at BEC and due to the fact that the stream gages <br />had different period of records, we decided that further smoothing and interpolation of the data <br />was necessary to develop reasonable results. Therefore, the hydrologic analysis supported <br />completely by frequency-discharge relationships computed for the individual gages proved very <br />reasonable with the added peak flow values of 1921. It is recommended that the results <br />presented in Table 3.2 above be used as the peak frequencies of flows at these stream gage <br />locations based on data through 1999. <br /> <br />3.2.2 Historic Sediment Information <br /> <br />Relatively long-term records of discharge-suspended sediment exist for the Arkansas <br />River at Las Animas gage station. The period of record for this Arkansas River location is from <br />October 1942 to March 1972. <br /> <br />Logarithm (base 10) regression analysis was performed for the Arkansas River at Las Animas. <br />Figure 4 shows the scatter data and linear relation for the entire data set. The analysis consisted <br />of entering the values into a spreadsheet program, performing unit conversions to arrive at water <br />discharge in cubic feet per second (cfs) and suspended sediment discharge in tons per day (t1d), <br />elimination of zero discharges, sorting, and finally, correlation analyses of the logs of the water <br />versus the suspended sediment discharges. These analyses were recalculated using months rather <br />than days. Table 3-3 provides information on the success of the mathematical representations. <br /> <br />Table 3-3. Correlation (R2 values) of discharge versus suspended sediment. <br /> <br />Time Period <br /> <br />Arkansas River at Las <br />Animas, CO <br />0.85 <br />0.86 <br />0.92 <br />0.75 <br />0.88 <br />0.90 <br />0.77 <br />0.81 <br />0.65 <br />0.90 <br />0.94 <br />0.95 <br />0.85 <br /> <br />January <br />February <br />March <br />April <br />May <br />June <br />July <br />August <br />September <br />October <br />November <br />December <br />Aggregate <br /> <br />The aggregate data and linear representations are relatively well behaved (smooth curves) <br />and consistent for the Arkansas River at Las Animas. The correlation coefficient for the <br />Arkansas River at Las Animas was 0.85. For the monthly analyses, the Arkansas River at Las <br />Animas shows reasonable curve fits, with correlation coefficients of 0.65 to 0.95. <br /> <br />29 <br />