Laserfiche WebLink
<br />12 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />John Martin Reservoir. Since that time the elevation of the top of this sandstone has <br />controlled a temporary base level that has slowed downcutting upstream from the <br />arch. This slowing of downcutting has causeq the river to meander widely along the <br />section between Adobe Creek and the arch" (Sharps 1969:C68-C69). <br /> <br />Sharps (1969:C70) attributed the lateral migration of the river to the disproportionate deposition <br />of large volumes of finer sediments from the river's tributaries. Recent studies indicate that <br />these geologic sedimentation processes, that involve the deposition of large amounts of sediment <br />to the main channel, are still active today (US ACE 1965:23, 1970:B65-B66, 1973:50-53, <br />1985:15; Nadler 1978:89, 113, 126; Nadler and Schumm 1981:104, 109, 113). <br /> <br />The Las Animas arch may also be responsible for the location of what has been described <br />as the famous "Big Timbers" (Grinnell 1923:82-85; ;Wolf 1932:207; West 1995:26-27, <br />frontpiece map). Big Timbers, located downstream bf John Martin Dam and the arch, extended <br />to the vicinity of Lamar and was the location of a large concentration of cottonwood trees, many <br />of which grew to huge sizes (Grinnell 1923:82-85; Wolf 1932:207). The Big Timbers was a <br />noted resting stop on the Santa Fe Trail and was also extensively used by Native American <br />during the winter months. The valley area below the arch widened and flood flows constricted <br />by the arch most likely rushed through the Las Anirrjas Arch flowing out of the channel to <br />overbank areas and spread over the widening valley.: This annual event would have replenished <br />the soil nutrients in this area and afforded the contin\1ed growth of a healthy and extensive <br />cottonwood forest. <br /> <br />Another interesting feature of the valley, located on the south side of the river, beginning <br />east of La Junta and reaching into central Kansas, is "the most striking sand-dune area of <br />Colorado" (Fenneman 1931:34). Eolian processes consistingof hard northwest winds blew the <br />lighter sands out of the river's floodplain to form th~ dunes (Elkin 1972:72; Fenneman 1931:34; <br />Holliday 1982:394-396). These "lighter sands" are also indicative of the sediments that are <br />being transported by stream flows and deposited in tj1e Arkansas River channel today. <br /> <br />The Arkansas River is an alluvial, sand-bed river with a "stream course [that] is <br />characterized by low banks and a broad sandy bed, which shifts frequently (USACE 1983a:4/1- <br />4/2,4/8-4/10; 1985:3; Watts and Lindner-Lunsford 1992:4). Historically the river, in the study <br />area, was a straight braided stream; however the river has undergone significant changes over the <br />last 150 years and most significantly since 1926 (Nadler 1978:117; Nadler and Schumm <br />1981:111). Nadler (1978) conducted an extensive st~dy on the Arkansas River that included <br />analysis of channel morphology such as width, deptl), width-depth ratio, meander wavelengths <br />and amplitude, and gradients along with hydrology, vegetation, and sediments. Nadler (1978) <br />and Nadler and Schumm (1981:95) indicate that the Arkansas and the South Platte Rivers <br />"...have undergone dramatic historic changes that are so extensive that they can be termed a <br />metamorphosis. " <br /> <br />Nadler (1978:58-60) and Nadler and Schumm (1981:95-97) use the ISO-year time period <br />which began with the 1849 California and 1859 Colorado gold rushes to pin-point a historical <br />reference point from which to reflect upon the significance of the introduction of intensive <br />agriculture and the subsequent development of irriglltion systems in the Arkansas and South <br />