Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~\ <br /> <br />l) <br />, <br /> <br />~. <br />~. <br />r <br /> <br />1 <br />:' <br />"-' <br />. <br />I <br />! <br />t <br />,. <br /> <br />! <br />f <br />I' <br />\!.: <br />, <br /> <br />[ <br /> <br />~"- <br /> <br />'. <br />l <br />! <br /> <br />REA VY PRECIPITATION PAPER <br /> <br />by <br />Samuel E. Baker. <br />Milton E. Brown' <br /> <br /> <br />A comparative study of retum periods for 24-hour precipitation from two consecutive 30-year <br />periods (1930-1959 and 1960-1989). <br /> <br />With the current debate over climate change there is an interest in updating climate studies that <br />were done over 30 years ago. <br /> <br />Weather Bureau Technical Paper 40, Rainfall FreQuem;y Atlas of the United States was prepared <br />in 1961 using rainfall data primarily from the 1930 to 1959 period. Rainfall data from the <br />subsequent 30-year period is now available for analysis. This paper is a graphical comparison of <br />the 1930-1959 and 1960-1989 24-hour precip data sets for the Southeast U.S. <br /> <br />Return periods are determined using methods similar to those employed in the preparation of <br />TP-40. Two sets of maps win be prepared. Each map set will compare the original TP-40 data <br />to the 24-hour return periods computed from each of the two 30-year data sets. This graphical <br />comparison should help to answer the question as to the current applicability ofTP-40. <br /> <br />A later study will utilize statistical techniques in an attempt to determine if the two 30-year data <br />sets are significantly different <br /> <br />RELATIONSlllP TO CONFERENCE TOPIC: <br /> <br />Floodplain managers, planners and engineers all need the most accurate climatic extreme and <br />weather data to do their jobs well. Are the latest data better than those upon which many studies <br />are based? Do climatic extreme studies in use today need to be updated to reflect changes in the <br />climate? Many of the climatic extreme studies in use today were done over 30 years ago using <br />data that were collected in thll 30s, 40s and 50s. Since that time another 30 years of data have <br />been collected. Are these data more relevant to today's needs than those of 30 years ago? <br /> <br />Using a graphical technique, this study attempts to show the difference, if any, of two <br />consecutive 30-year data sets. The aim is to see if some of the old studies need to be updated <br />using the more recent data. <br /> <br />Samuel E. Baker, Service Hydrologist, National Weather Service Forecast Office, 2909 Aviation Way, <br />West Columbia, South Carolina 29170, Tel. (803) 822-8037 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Milton E. Brown, Regional Climatologist, Southeast Regional Climatic Center, 1201 Main Street, Suite <br />1100, Columbia, South Carolina 29201, Tel. (803) 737-0850 <br />