My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07018
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:36 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:41:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Emergency Bank Stabilization Arroyo De La Guna
Date
3/1/1998
Prepared For
California
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The federal declaration activates the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to assist <br />the declared counties with response and recovery missions. In some cases, grants and low <br />interest loans are made available to natural disaster victims. <br /> <br />There is a USGS stream gage on Arroya De La Guna near Pleasanton, which is not far from the <br />project area. The drainage area for the Arroyo De La Guna gage is approximately 405 square <br />miles. According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the gage recorded a peak flow of 7,200 <br />cfs on February 2, 1998. For comparison, the two highest annual peaks recorded for that gage <br />were 11,400 cfs and 10,500 cfs in 1982 and 1983, respectively. The 1998 gaged peak flow is the <br />4th highest in the 41 year period of record for the gage. However, the worst flood and erosion <br />damage due to high water in the arroyo was caused in 1998. <br /> <br />Based on field measurements of a channel cross-section, high water marks, channel slope, and <br />roughness values, it was estimated that the peak flow in the arroyo at the subject property was <br />well over 10,000 cfs for the 1998 event. Based on the estimated peak flow of more than 10,000 <br />cfs using field measurements (otherwise known as an indirect measurement), there is an apparent <br />discrepancy between the USGS gaged flow and the indirect flow. The USGS was contacted and <br />notified of the discrepancy, and said that the rating curve and peak flow for the gage would be <br />investigated. <br /> <br />An existing reservoir, Del Valle, located on Arroyo Valle upstream of Livermore, was reported <br />to have filled to capacity during the high water period in February of 1998. California water <br />officials reported that once the reservoir filled to capacity, all reservoir inflows were released or <br />"passed through" the reservoir to prevent overfilling. The timing of the releases has not <br />identified, so it is possible that the releases may not have helped to reduce the peak flood flows <br />in the downstream arroyos. On the other hand, the reservoir may have helped the situation by <br />storing inflows during the flood peaks if the release timing was appropriate. <br /> <br />There is also a USGS stream gage on Arroyo Valle near Livermore that recorded a peak <br />discharge of about 18,000 cfs in 1955. That discharge represents a maximwn annual peak during <br />a 19 year period-of-record for that gage. The drainage area above the Arroyo Valle gage is <br />approximately 147 square miles. <br /> <br />III. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Methodolol!V <br />Existing floodplain information for Arroyo De La Guna is contained in the latest revision of the <br />Alameda County Flood Insurance Study (FIS), which was published by the Federal Emergency <br />Management Agency (FEMA)in September 1997. A copy of the FIS was obtained from FEMA, <br />but the Flood Insurance Rate Maps were out of stock and unavailable at the time of this study. <br /> <br />In addition to the FEMA information, flood discharge-frequency relationships for the subject <br />arroyo were computed for this study by performing a statistical analysis of 41 years worth of <br />gage data for the nearby streamflow gaging station. Computations were also made based on <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.