Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Fig. 2e. Effect of Flood I"orecosting <br /> <br />Ne <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />I. <br />I, <br />s " <br />// <br />~:::'7 . <br />WITH RESERVOIR <br />AND FOREl:AmNG <br /> <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.00 <br /> <br />Knowfrtg' in ad'tlnce whel"t! and how IllUCh runoff wfll OCcur allows flood control <br />measures. such IS reservotrs and diversiOns, to be 'operated 1n I IIIInner such <br />that flows are bett.,. controlled It ctftfcal ~ge cenUrs result1nq in lower <br />flows thin without f'Or8Castfnq. The planned for effeet is therefore'ln ,ddf- <br />ttonal lowering of the flow-frequency nllttonship, No other functions are <br />directly affected. Esttmates of future flood events cln COllIe from II rul-tflll! <br />flood forecasting system using rainfall and stream measurements and hydrologic <br />simulatton lIIOdets. Reut"Vofrs are then operated using the forecnt data to <br />tlllprOve use of storage. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT I <br />7 OF 12 <br /> <br />~I <br />