My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06991
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:32 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:40:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
242
County
Grand
Community
Winter Park
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Winter Park, Colorado
Date
11/1/1985
Designation Date
11/1/1985
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Leland Creek shallow flood boundaries along the u.s. Highway 40 <br />embankments, northwest of Leland Creek, were delineated using topo- <br />graphic mapping described above. <br /> <br />Approximate flood boundaries along Jim Creek have been delineated <br />using topographic maps at a scale of 1:24,000 (Reference 13), and <br />methods described in Section 3.2. <br /> <br />The 100- and SOO-year flood plain boundaries are shown on the Flood <br />BOundary and Floodway Map (Exhibit 2). In cases where the 100- <br />and SO a-year flood plain boundaries are close together, only the <br />lOa-year flood plain boundary has been shown. Small areas within <br />the flood plain boundaries may lie above the flood elevations but <br />cannot be shown due to limitations of the map scale and/or lack of <br />detailed topographic data. <br /> <br />For the streams studied by approximate methods, only the lOa-year <br />flood plain boundary is shown. <br /> <br />4. 2 Floodways <br /> <br />Encroachment on flood plains, such as structures and fill, reduces <br />flood-carrying capacity, increases flood heights and velocities, <br />and increases flood hazards in areas beyond the encroachment itself. <br />One aspect of flood plain management involves balancing the economic <br />gain from flood plain development against the resulting increase <br />in flood hazard. For purposes of the NFIP, a floodway is used as <br />a tool to assist local communities in this aspect of flood plain <br />management. Under this concept, the area of the lOa-year flood <br />plain is divided into a floodway and a floodway fringe. The flood- <br />way is the channel of a stream, plus any adjacent flood plain areas, <br />that must be kept free of encroachment so that the lOa-year flood <br />can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. <br />Minimum Federal standards limit such increases to 1.0 foot, provided <br />that hazardous velocities are not produced. The floodways in this <br />study are presented to local agencies as minimum standards that <br />can be adopted directly or that can be used as a basis for addi- <br />tional floodway studies. <br /> <br />The floodways presented in this study were computed on the basis <br />of equal conveyance reduction from each side of the flood plain. <br />The results of these computations are tabulated at selected cross <br />sections for each stream segment for which a floodway is computed <br />(Table 4). <br /> <br />No floodway has been presented for Leland Creek downstream of U.S. <br />Highway 40 because all flooding is contained within the channel. <br /> <br />As shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (Exhibit 2), the <br />floodway boundaries were computed at cross sections. Between cross <br />sections, the boundaries were interpolated. In cases where the <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.