Laserfiche WebLink
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />In 1991, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), <br />in cooperation with the Flood Control District of <br />Maricopa County, began a 6-year study of <br />flow-induced vegetation changes and the resultant <br />effect on channel conveyances of streams in central <br />Arizona. Because accurate calculation of channel <br />conveyance is critical for open-channel hydraulic <br />studies, a major objective of this study was to <br />develop a relation to quantifY the effects of <br />flow-induced vegetation changes on channel <br />conveyances and computed water-surface <br />elevations. To accomplish this objective, <br />considerable field work was performed at selected <br />sites to col1ect the data that were needed to <br />accurately characterize streamflow, vegetation, and <br />channel conditions. <br /> <br />Computations of channel conveyance for <br />open-channel flow require an evaluation of channel <br />roughness. Channel roughness reflects the <br />channel's resistance to flow and usually is <br />expressed by a roughness coefficient. Manning's <br />roughness coefficient, n, represents the composite <br />effect of a variety of flow-resistance factors that <br />include bed material, channel shape, and <br />vegetation characteristics (Cowan, 1956). Cowan <br />(1956) indicated that channel vegetation can have <br />the greatest potential effect on the total roughness <br />coefficient selected for a reach, Thomsen and <br />Hjalmarson (1991) describe the major effect of <br />vegetation on total roughness for streams in <br />semiarid to arid climates typical of the <br />southwestern United States. In these types of <br />environments and in a period of only a few years, <br />vegetation may grow to ful1 maturity throughout <br />the main channel of natural and manmade streams, <br />which results in large increases in estimates of n <br />(Aldridge and Garrett, 1973; Thomsen and <br />Hjalmarson, 1991). Although the vegetation may <br />appear substantial, peak flows that are powerful <br />enough to layover or remove vegetation often <br />occur during moderate to large flooding in central <br />Arizona (Burkham, 1976; Phil1ips and Hjalmarson, <br />1994), The flattened or removed vegetation <br />markedly decreases preflow estimates of n, This <br />decrease in n increases peak-flow channel <br />conveyances and effectively lowers peak-flow <br /> <br />water-surface elevation of the flow compared to <br />preflow predictions. <br />Although past investigations have presented <br />information useful for assessing the effects of peak <br />flow on roughness characteristics of grasses in <br />manmade channels (Ree and Palmer, 1949; Soil <br />Conservation Service, 1954; Kouwen and Li, <br />1980; Temple, 1980; and Kouwen, 1992), almost <br />no guidelines are available to evaluate the effects <br />of flow on larger vegetation types such as brush <br />and small trees that commonly grow throughout <br />the main channel of streams in the southwestern <br />United States (House and I>earthree, 1995, <br />p. 3068). The ability of flows to substantial1y alter <br />vegetation characteristics and the lack of adequate <br />guidelines to assess these changes can result in <br />uncertainties and erroneous channel-conveyance <br />calculations, These uncertainties and errors could <br />result in poor management of waterways, poor <br />estimates of peak discharge, and improper design <br />of bridges, culverts, road grades, and other <br />water-related structures. The Flood Control <br />District of Maricopa County funded this study in <br />order to decrease the amount of uncertainty <br />associated with estimating peak-flow vegetation <br />conditions for channel-conveyance computations. <br /> <br />Purpose and Scope <br /> <br />The purpose of this report is to provide <br />information and new methodologies to engineers, <br />hydrologists, planners, and researchers so that <br />better assessments can be made to determine <br />variations of channel conveyance that result from <br />changes in vegetation characteristics. Data <br />col1ected for 26 peak flows at 19 sites in a 6-year <br />period in central Arizona were used to assess <br />flow-induced changes in vegetation conditions <br />(fig. I). A semiempirical relation that describes <br />flow-induced changes in vegetation is presented as <br />well as the subsequent effect of these changes on <br />flow resistance. The changes in water-surface <br />elevations for estimated preflow- and <br />postflow-vegetation conditions were computed and <br />presented for each of the study sites. The purpose <br />of presenting this information is to illustrate <br />potential errors that can accompany incorrect <br />assessments of n values caused by flow-induced <br />vegetation changes, An example case illustrates <br /> <br />2 Method to Estimate Effects ot Flow-Induced Vegetation Changes on Channel Conveyances 01 Streams in Central Arizona <br />